antitative Research Designs

Research, Theory, Design & Methods: Week 5

Week 5: Quantitative Research Designs

1. Returning to the Grand Canyon panorama, a few questions come to mind as you prepare to leave for your next trip: How should you go about pinpointing the exact spot from which to photograph? Will changes in the lighting make integrating new pictures into your panorama difficult? In any case, you now have a purpose for your trip, can state your intentions, and can identify key questions that invite a search for answers and focus your approach to your next trip.

2. You are now at a similar point in your understanding of the research process, such that an overall framework, including philosophical orientation, theory, literature, problem, and purpose, is falling into place. This week, you will continue to expand your understanding of this framework by analyzing and evaluating research questions and hypotheses in quantitative studies. You will also learn about various quantitative research designs that researchers use to answer their research questions. You will also continue to analyze the interrelated elements of a research study, making the connection among theory, problem, purpose and, now, research questions, hypotheses, and design.

Learning Objectives

Students will:

· Evaluate quantitative research questions and hypotheses in research studies published in peer-reviewed journals

· Identify quantitative designs in research studies published in peer-reviewed journals

· Explain use of quantitative designs in research studies published in peer-reviewed journals

· Analyze alignment among theory, problem, purpose, research questions and hypotheses, and design in quantitative research studies published in peer-reviewed journals

· Apply APA Style to writing

Learning Resources

Required Readings

· Babbie, E. (2017). Basics of social research (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. Chapter 5, “Conceptualization, Operationalization, and Measurement”

· Burkholder, G. J., Cox, K. A., & Crawford, L. M. (2016). The scholar-practitioner’s guide to research design. Baltimore, MD: Laureate Publishing. Chapter 4, “Quantitative Research Designs

· Document: Journal Articles (Word Document)

For the discussion, download this document, refer to the assigned journal articles for your program, and find these articles in Walden Library.

This checklist is not meant to be used in a Yes/No response format in writing your discussion post, but rather as a guide to facilitate your evaluation.

Required Media

· Laureate Education (Producer). (2015). Overview of quantitative research methods [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

· Laureate Education (Producer). (2009d). Quantitative methods: An example [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 13 minutes.

Document: Research Questions and Hypotheses Checklist (PDF)

Discussion Part:

Discussion: Evaluating Research Questions, Hypotheses, and Quantitative Research Designs

1. With a clear purpose in place, quantitative researchers have a roadmap for crafting their research questions and hypotheses that will further focus the approach they will take to investigate their topic (i.e., their study’s research design).

The selection of a research design is guided by the study’s purpose and research questions and hypotheses, and the design then links the research questions and hypotheses to the data that will be collected. You should keep in mind, however, that the research process is interactive, not necessarily proceeding in a linear fashion from one component to the next. Rather, the writing of research questions could, for example, necessitate adjustments to the study’s purpose statement. Nevertheless, when presented together, the various components of a research study should align. As you learned last week, alignment means that a research study possesses clear and logical connections among all of its various components.

In addition to considering alignment, when researchers select a research design, they must also consider the ethical implications of their choice, including, for example, what their design selection means for participant recruitment, procedures, and privacy.

· For this Discussion, you will evaluate quantitative research questions and hypotheses in assigned journal articles in your discipline and consider the alignment of theory, problem, purpose, research questions and hypotheses, and design. You will also identify the type of quantitative research design the authors used and explain how it was implemented. Quasi-experimental, casual comparative, correlational, pretest–posttest, or true experimental are examples of types of research designs used in quantitative research.

· With these thoughts in mind, refer to the Journal Articles document for your assigned articles for this Discussion. If your last name starts with A through I, use Article A. If your last name starts with J through R, use Article B. If your last name starts with S through Z, use Article C.

By Day 4

Post a critique of the research study in which you:

· Evaluate the research questions and hypotheses (The Research Questions and Hypotheses Checklist can be used as a guide to facilitate your evaluation; it is not meant to be used in a Yes/No response format in writing your Discussion post.)

· Identify the type of quantitative research design used and explain how the researchers implemented the design

· Analyze alignment among the theory, problem, purpose, research questions and hypotheses, and design

· Be sure to support your Main Issue Post and Response Post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA Style.

Read a selection of your classmates’ postings

By Day 6

Respond to a classmate who was assigned a different article than you by further supporting his or her critique or respectfully offering a differing perspective.

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric: Week 5 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 4 and Respond by Day 6

To participate in this Discussion: Week 5 Discussion