NHS5004 Communication, Collaboration, and Case Analysis for Master’s Learners

/in /by

NHS5004
This course prepares learners for master’s-level course work in the School of Nursing and Health Sciences. Throughout the course, learners analyze how the role of the practitioner-scholar guides leadership in the health care field and determine the ways in which they can effectively use communication strategies expected of health care professionals. In particular, learners examine the attributes that contribute to effective and ethical health care leadership, including professional collaboration, communication, inclusion, and decision making. Must be taken during the learner’s first quarter. Cannot be fulfilled by transfer.
Assignment: NHS 5004 Safety Delivery Solution
NHS5004 Collaboration, Communication, & Case Analysis for Health Care Master’s Learners
Assessment 1
Preparation
Health care leaders often find that resolving a problem in delivering safe, high-quality health care requires the combined effort of a number of agencies, departments, and individuals.
For this assessment, identify a quality-related situation or problem relevant to your professional practice or area of interest that requires the collaborative effort of several departments and individuals to resolve. You will assume the role of team leader and draft a proposal for the organization’s executive leadership that outlines why this interprofessional team is necessary, who should take part in the collaboration, how the team will function, and how progress will be reported.
A project proposal should identify the situation or problem, identify the causes or contributing factors, present a plan of action, provide details about the plan, and provide reasons why the plan should be undertaken.
Note: Remember, you can submit all or a portion of your draft to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version of your proposal for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback if you plan on using this free service
Proposal Requirements
Write a proposal for assembling an interprofessional team. As you begin drafting your proposal, consider your goal and the needs of the leaders whose decisions will be based on the information you provide.
Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the Interprofessional Collaboration scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. You are provided an example proposal that illustrates what proficient-level work for this assessment looks like.
Proposal Format and APA Style
Use the simplified Project Proposal Template, linked in the Resources, to draft your proposal. You may organize the content of your proposal in a format used in your organization. An abstract is not required.
Your proposal should be 4–6 double-spaced pages in length, not including the title page and reference page.
Apply correct APA formatting to all in-text citations and references.
Use Times New Roman, 12-point font.

 

Complete your paper of 6-8 pages, plus cover page and references page, explaining your investigation of three hypothetical practice sites for an EBP QI project.

/in /by

Part 1: Key Project Elements
Complete your paper of 6-8 pages, plus cover page and references page, explaining your investigation of three hypothetical practice sites for an EBP QI project.
Part 2: Implementation Science Presentation
Complete your PowerPoint presentation of 3-5 slides, plus cover and reference slides, to inform hypothetical stakeholders.
Reminder:
The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references.
The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632 Links to an external site.). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

 

There are two parts to this assignment. Part 1: Try to remember the billboards on your commute to…

/in /by

There are two parts to this assignment.
Part 1: Try to remember the billboards on your commute to work or school. How many do you think there are? Explain why you remembered any of them. Next time you are on that route, note how many billboards there actually are. Are they effective?
Part 2–Yot would you suggest to make it better than existing sites?
· Answer both parts
· APA Format
· Must have at least 2 references with citations in the body of the paper
· Between 650 – 750 words

Nursing science contributes to the unique body of knowledge for the nursing profession. Each profession defines what is meant by science that guides the development of knowledge.

/in /by

Is your worldview closer to the positivist or the constructivist paradigm?
Post a total of 3 substantive responses over 2 separate days for full participation. This includes your initial post and 2 replies to classmates or your faculty member.
Nursing science contributes to the unique body of knowledge for the nursing profession. Each profession defines what is meant by science that guides the development of knowledge. Though different words are used, there are basically two scientific paradigms: empirical/positivist and constructivist/naturalism. The paradigms align with either quantitative or qualitative research. You have expressed an interest in joining an evidence-based practice (EBP) team at your workplace. It will be important for you to understand your dominant worldview as a team member.
Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:
Is your worldview closer to the positivist or the constructivist paradigm?
Explain why and how each paradigm is aligned with either quantitative or qualitative research.
Cite references for all sources.
Post 2 replies to classmates or your faculty member. Be constructive and professional.Post a total of 3 substantive responses over 2 separate days for full participation. This includes your initial post and 2 replies to classmates or your faculty member.
Nursing science contributes to the unique body of knowledge for the nursing profession. Each profession defines what is meant by science that guides the development of knowledge. Though different words are used, there are basically two scientific paradigms: empirical/positivist and constructivist/naturalism. The paradigms align with either quantitative or qualitative research. You have expressed an interest in joining an evidence-based practice (EBP) team at your workplace. It will be important for you to understand your dominant worldview as a team member.
Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:
Is your worldview closer to the positivist or the constructivist paradigm?
Explain why and how each paradigm is aligned with either quantitative or qualitative research.
Cite references for all sources.
Post 2 replies to classmates or your faculty member. Be constructive and professional

 

Ponting Carpet Mills manufacturers a special brand of Super Frieze carets. nd of a production run fo

/in /by

Ponting Carpet Mills manufacturers a special brand of Super Frieze carets. nd of a production run for this carpet is $150 per run. Th carpet is $1.50 30,000 carpets. The cost of prepare per square yard per year. The annual demand for this special brand of carpet is square yards. The manufacturing facility produces this special brand 300 days per year e inventory carrying cost for this brand of and the plant can produce the carpet at a rate of 300 square yards per day. Use 4 decimal places in your calculations (if needed) and if necessary round your final answer to the closest whole number. If you're final answer requires rounding use the rounded value in the questions that follow. 6. What is the optimum quantity of carpet to produce? 7. What is the maximum inventory achieved during a production run? 8. How many production runs (i.e. setups) are needed to meet the annual length of a production run?

NURS6212 Health Care Quality and Safety Management

/in /by

NURS6212
Learners in this course examine the nurse leader’s role in helping to effectively integrate into health care delivery systems the quality and safety principles that inform evidence-based changes and best practices. Learners demonstrate an understanding of the ways they can measure health care quality and safety; monitor and assess patient safety and outcomes; develop a transparent system for identifying and resolving medical errors and adverse patient outcomes; use data to monitor and improve patient care and outcomes; and support a culture of quality and safety.  For MSN learners only.

 

What does the Sec/Div control on an oscilloscope do?

/in /by

What does the Sec/Div control on an oscilloscope do?
The post What does the Sec/Div control on an oscilloscope do? appeared first on Class Assignments Help.
What does the Sec/Div control on an oscilloscope do? was first posted on September 21, 2022 at 5:30 pm.©2019 "Class Assignments Help". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at [email protected]

NURS6038 Evidence-Based Practice and Technology for Nursing

/in /by

NURS6038
In this course, learners analyze the diverse frameworks of research and evidence-based nursing practice. Learners differentiate between various types of research strategies, examine ways to search for evidence effectively and efficiently, and propose an evidence-based strategy to solve a clinical problem. Learners also evaluate ethical considerations associated with conducting research. ​ For MSN, DNP, and Graduate Certificate learners only.
Background and Instructions
For this assignment, you will focus on creating your own search strategy and prepare a reflection on your process. Since you may use this research to help you with your final assignment, it will be important to also review the Proposing an Evidence-Based Solution Scoring Guide prior to starting this assignment.
Locate five relevant research articles that address the clinical problem that you are interested in learning more about. As you research, use the Creating a Search Strategy Template, linked in Resources, to record your research process, strategies used, and the five articles you felt were the most relevant
To complete the assignment, you will write a 2–3 page reflection on your research process. Your reflection will outline your main search strategies and criteria used to evaluate the relevance of the evidence. Submit the Creating a Search Strategy Template along with your reflection.
The following points and questions may be helpful as you plan your assignment:

Complete the table in the Creating a Search Strategy Template.
What search terms did you use? Why?
What type of strategies did you use either to narrow or to broaden your search results?
What was your criteria process for selecting the articles for further investigation?
How does knowing the differences between the research approaches and designs, and their characteristics, inform your review?
How does this make your review more evaluative?
What is your criteria process for selecting the articles?
What criteria in the article made you feel it would be the most relevant to your topic?

Grading Criteria
These items correspond to the grading criteria in this assignment’s scoring guide. The sub-bullets are a guide for how you can work to ensure that you meet each scoring guide criterion.

Identify elements in a research report (Competency 1).

Identify research evidence.
Examine the research-practice connection.​

Describe a personal search strategy using a database (Competency 2).

Identify databases to locate high-quality evidence.
Examine strategies to locate evidence-based evidence.

Describe how systematizing the research approach and design can inform the review of the research article (Competency 1).

Assess the relevance and credibility of information sources.
Critique a research article.
Examine evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

Describe the types of criteria that should be reviewed to make sure the research articles are relevant and valid (Competency 3).

Examine how the research approach impacts the findings.
Describe characteristics of a clinical question that is answerable be research evidence.
Identify specific appraisal criteria for original sources that are consistent with the research approach used.
Identify criteria used to evaluate the credibility, clinical significance, and applicability of the evidence.

Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics and correctly format citations using APA style (Competency 5).

Determine the proper application of APA formatting requirements and scholarly writing standards.
Apply the principles of effective composition.
Determine the proper application of the rules of grammar and mechanics.
Assess the relevance and credibility of information sources.

Submission Requirements

Written communication: Effectively integrate research into your submission, with correct format, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics. Ensure submission is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
Length of paper: Your ethical analysis must be 2–3 pages long, double-spaced, excluding the cover page and references.
References: Build on the Unit 4 assignment by utilizing those references, and add at least 5 more current sources.
Formatting: Format resources and citations according to current APA style and formatting guidelines.

Include cover page, introduction, body, conclusion, and reference page.
Use current APA level 1, 2, and 3 headings as needed.

Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

 

8. You are attempting to develop a quality monitoring system for some parts purchased from Charles S

/in /by

8. You are attempting to develop a quality monitoring system for some parts purchased from Charles Sox Manufacturing Co. These parts are either good or defective. You have decided to take a sample of 100 units. Develop a table of the appropriate upper and lower control chart limits for various values of the average fraction defective in the samples taken. The values for p in this table should range from 0.01 to 0.09 in increments of 0.02. Enter the upper and lower control limits for a 99.73 % confidence level in the table below (enter your responses as numbers between 0 and 1, rounded to three decimal places). n100 UCL LCL 0.01 0.040 0.000 0.03 0.081 0.000 0.05 0.094 0.006 0.07 0.09

NURS6410 Fundamentals of Nursing Informatics

/in /by

NURS6410
Throughout the course, learners analyze the roles, theories, ethical implications, and standards of nursing informatics practice. Learners identify the rules, regulations, and current trends that govern professionals in the field. In addition, learners examine the evolution and perspectives of nursing informatics and apply knowledge and skills needed to lead and support improvements in health care.  For MSN learners only.