Division Staff Officer
Link for the uploaded videos for the paper. https://tbf.me/a/iGrTr For this assignment, you are continuing your role from your F105 assignment as a senior staff officer working on a division staff. Your F105 information paper updated the CG on general JLTV program information using sources provided to you in the document called F100 Information Paper and Essay References. These and other updated sources are still valid for this assignment, but the F107 assignment has a different purpose and format than the F105 assignment and will need to provide authoritative and convincing analysis to help the CG make a decision. For this assignment, you are in the role of a Division Staff Officer taking a brief for your principal. View one set of video staff briefings (links below) for the MP battalion you are taking the briefing from or the other. Either battalion Brief (set of videos) is acceptable and are provided as many DL students have never seen a staff group analysis briefing and these are provided as good examples. They are different sets of analysis based on the same scenario replicating what might happen with two different battalion staffs in the field doing an analysis. These are also provided/linked in the F107 lesson folder (F107 Videos,
Part 2: Student Briefs) along with two other example sets of group briefings should you want to see slightly different approaches and or analysis of the same problem. Use only one set of videos as you prepare your staff recommendation for the CG. After viewing the videos (replicating your attendance at their briefing), prepare and submit a position paper in argumentative essay style recommending to your Senior Staff Officer/Principal for or against the Battalions proposal. Refer to ST 22-2 Leader Communication (March 2016) to review the components of an argumentative essay and the citations of sources. Your essay must have an introduction with a thesis statement; body paragraphs with topic sentences, supporting key points, and examples/evidence to support the thesis; and a conclusion that summarizes the main points and reiterates the thesis.
TOPIC: Incorporating points from one set of the battalion presentations and other authoritative sources, articulate your recommendation as a division staff officer on whether the divisions JLTV initial fielding plan should be changed or not. The recommendation analysis should include the number of vehicles, the “bill-payer” strategy, the potential impacts or pushback from other stakeholders, and the risks. Include at least two DOTMLPF-P domain considerations (doctrine, organization, training, equipment, leadership and education, personnel, facilities, and policy), and a recommendation for a TOE or an MTOE change. Do not provide a simple summation to the question. You must write an argumentative essay, and hence argue the senior staff point of view supported by specific examples and evidence to convince the CG. ****** GUIDANCE FOR WRITING THE ESSAY: Must be typed and double-spaced Must use Arial 12-pitch font and one-inch margins Must be a minimum of three pages, but cannot exceed five pages Must provide endnote or footnote citation and a bibliography IAW CGSC ST22-2. Must use active voice and NOT use the first person

What do these traits and personal qualities say about how you would lead others? What are their implications for your leadership style?The purpose of this assignment is to help you assess your leadership style through a combination of self-reporting instruments and feedback from others.
Step 1: Complete EACH of the following questionnaires: Leadership Trait Questionnaire. For this questionnaire alone, ask five other people, preferably work colleagues, to fill out the questionnaire, and you will need to answer the questions as well. Follow the scoring instructions. What do these traits and personal qualities say about how you would lead others? What are their implications for your leadership style? Task and Relationship Questionnaire: Report on your score for this questionnaire and tell how your preferences for task or relationship behaviors impact the way you tend to lead and manage others. Fully explain what it means to be task or relationship oriented before you talk about the impact of these styles. Path Goal Leadership Questionnaire and report your scores and describe the implications of these scores for how you lead others. In other words what behaviors are your subordinates likely to see with a person who has these scores? Psychodynamic Approach Questionnaire — this is a very brief form of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Score the instrument and describe how your personality style would impact the way you lead.
Step 2: Based on the aggregate, and individual results of these questionnaires, describe who you are as a leader. Identify your specific leadership style based on the results of the questionnaires; explain/support how the results led you to determine that your current preferred leadership style being sure to define the key characteristics of the leadership style and then correlate results from the questionnaires to those key characteristics.
Step 3: (a) Identify your strengths and weaknesses as a leader, (b) explain how those strengths and weaknesses would impact your followers and (c) identify concrete ways in which you would maximize your strengths and minimize your weaknesses to achieve the fullest potential as a leader. Be sure to fully support/explain each option using APA formatted in-text citations; remember that all in-text citations must also be included in the reference section (conversely all references included in the reference section must be included as in-text citations). Additional Requirements: The paper must be between 4 -6 pages, excluding the cover and reference pages. Include clear and succinct introduction and summary paragraphs. Use course readings, scholarly sources from the UMUC online library, and/or the weekly modules to support your analysis do not use Wikipedia as a source. You must use at least 5 sources published within the last three to five years. Follow APA style guidelines for the cover page, in-text citations and reference page (an abstract is not required for this assignment). The paper should be double-spaced with 1-inch margins with 12 pt. Times New Roman or 10 pt. Arial font. Due Date Mar 31, 2019 11:59 PM

Propose individualized comprehensive care by integrating theories and principles of nursing and related disciplines when planning comprehensive patient-centered care.
CO1 Propose individualized comprehensive care by integrating theories and principles of nursing and related disciplines when planning comprehensive patient-centered care. (PO 1)
CO7 Compare and contrast the professional nursing roles for ADN/diploma through PhD/DNP prepared nurses in providing cost-effective, quality healthcare in structured and unstructured systems. (PO 7)
How do nurses promote patient safety and improve quality at your workplace? How do you report errors and near misses? What changes would you suggest be made on your unit or facility to improve a nonpunitive culture of safety?regarding communication/collaboration and evidence-based practice.I would like you to think beyond the obvious. By that I mean, we all know about the use of bed alarms, restraints and sometimes sedation to keep a patient safe. What is the cause of the patient needing safety measures? Can the cause be addressed first? Is the fact you are assessing the cause categorize itself as a safety measure? In your posts, utilize what you have learned regarding communication/collaboration and evidence-based practice.

Professional Practice and Magnet Designation Paper. For this Application assignment, you are to write a four to five page paper on how a nursing professional practice model (PPM) or Magnet designation drives healthcare change in institutions.Review your readings from this week and conduct your own literature review on the topic. For this paper, include the following:
•Provide an overview of a professional practice model or Magnet. Address how the PPM or Magnet status drives health care change in institutions.
•Make sure to cite at least five sources from professional nursing literature within your paper. Refer to the Professional Practice Application Rubric located in the “Course Info” section of the course prior to submission