Employment Law and the Hiring Process
After briefing the management team on employment law from Assignment 1, it is time to apply the knowledge to internal processes. There exist many fundamental legal concerns surrounding recruiting and the overall hiring processes within organizations. A current review of the company’s HR policies and procedures centered on employment law reveals some possible opportunities to improve the overall recruitment and hiring process. More pinpointed opportunities exist in background checks, employment tests, and hiring and promotions. If not properly administered, these areas may cause employment law issues within the company.
Write a six to eight (6-8) page paper in which you:
*Briefly explain your overall understanding of conducting employee background checks. Why are they done? Why are they important? Be clear with your discussion.
*Identify and discuss at least two (2) types of background checks you believe most organizations conduct and explain how you will ensure the types you select are properly administered in the company.
*List and describe at least five (5) employee drug testing procedures you should ensure in order to comply with state drug testing laws. How would you ensure adherence to the procedures?
*Briefly discuss your understanding of bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ), affirmative action preferences, and promotions. Then, identify at least three (3) actions you would take to avoid employment law issues with these topics. Be specific.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

Program evaluations serve to answer two critical questions: What have we been able to do; and what have the results been? As an executive director you are most likely going to be asked these questions by your board, constituents, and funders. Using evaluation and the logic model results in effective programming and offers greater learning opportunities, better documentation of outcomes, and shared knowledge about what works and why.
In this Discussion, select a nonprofit program you are familiar with.
With these thoughts in mind:
Post your answers to the following questions:
Has this program been evaluated? If so, explain the evaluation process and what the results were. If a program evaluation was not completed, identify the type of evaluation you would conduct and complete, and why you would select that type of evaluation to conduct.
Using the “Logic Model Development Guide,” draw a simple logic model for your program and explain each element. Explain how this aligns with your program’s goal and your organization’s mission.

Select a small business with which you are familiar Use the business called CamiCakes ( https://www.camicakes.com ) . Imagine that you have been called into that business to provide a consultation on training. Create a comprehensive training proposal for the business.
Write a5 page paper in which you:
Analyze key elements of training and development geared toward improving the performance of the specific small business for which you are consulting.
Predict three to five (3-5) potential challenges that the managers or owners of the business could face in addressing organizational performance.
Justify the effects of detecting organizational gaps in small business, providing examples to explain the rationale.
Propose a competitive training strategy that will improve the position of the business in the market. The strategy should include, at a minimum, an agenda of training activities, rationale for instructional strategies used, and the return on investment (ROI) that will be gained from the strategy you have developed.
Use at least three (3) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as academic resources
Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements:
This course requires use of new Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details.
Typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.
Include a reference page. Citations and references must follow SWS format. The reference page is not included in the required page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Analyze concepts, meanings, and trends in training.
Justify the importance of aligning training with organizational strategy.
Evaluate theories associated with learning, motivation, and employee performance.
Use technology and information resources to research issues in training and development.
Write clearly and concisely about training and development using proper writing mechanics.
attachmentStrayer_Writin

this assignment piggy back off assignment 1
Now that you assessed the business, identified some of the inefficient HR related processes plaguing Larson Property Management Company, and pinpointed a few possible solutions, it is time to choose an HRIS application that will best suit the business. In this assignment, you will provide a blueprint for the new system, and select a vendor that provides the type of HRIS you believe is most efficient and effective.
To prepare for this assignment, review the Larson Property Management Company case scenario, and then research logical process modeling with data flow diagrams and HRIS vendors that may suit the needs for Larson Property Management.
Instructions:
Write a three to four-page proposal, in which you:
Two Ways to View an HRIS: Data Versus Process
1. Explain the importance of viewing the HRIS from both a data and process perspective. Next, explain how the change team will use this information to address identified needs from Phase II: Analysis.
Logical Process Modeling with Data Flow Diagrams and Physical Design Choice
2. Based on your research of logical process modeling with data flow diagrams, explain the key business activities and processes in the HR system, and how the data will flow. Next, determine the physical design and explain your reasoning for the design. Defend your decisions with theory and findings from past readings and class activities.
Choose HRIS Vendor
3. Now that you know the type of HRIS you will be implementing, it is time to choose an HRIS vendor. Compare and contrast three vendors, including a description of the cost, capabilities, and HR functions that the HRIS caters to. Based on your comparison, choose the HRIS vendor that you will recommend to your client, and explain the main reason why you decided to choose this vendor over the others.
Resources
4. Use at least three quality academic resources in this assignment. Note:Wikipedia and similar websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, your name, your professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.
Include a reference page. Citations and references must follow APA format. The reference page is not included in the required page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Create an HRIS needs analysis and evaluate the acquisition process.
Understand the purpose and components of the Data Flow Diagram (DFD).
Understand the various criteria used to evaluate vendor proposals.

Was the CNET story sufficient justification for the HP board’s actions? Why or why not?
2 HP Chairwoman Patricia Dunn defended the actions of the board by arguing that HP’S higher standards of corporate integrity justified such aggressive actions as pre-texting. Does its higher standards make the behavior of the board more or less ethical? Explain.
3 Does the fact that HP’s legal advisers approved the actions of Dunn and her board beforehand clear them of all responsibility in this case? Why or why not?
4 Does pre-texting match the founding principles of “the HP Way?
5 The board voted to dismiss Patricia Dunn in light of her indictment-was that the right decision? Why or why not?
attachment20190128_174314.jpgattachment20190128_174319.jpgattachment20190128_174322.jpgattachment20190128_174328.jpgattachment20190128_174331.jpgattachment20190128_174338.jpgattachment20190128_174342.jpgattachment20190128_174346.jpgattachment20190128_174349.jpgattachment20190128_174355.jpgattachment20190128_174358.jpgattachment20190128_174355.jpgattachment20190128_174404.jpgattachment20190128_174422.jpgattachment15487203373879150767597487538292.jpg