Using the CSU Online Library and other disciplinary resources, research how qualitative research is used in your field. Using this information, write an essay that describes how qualitative research tools can be used to aid in decision making within your field. Be sure your essay addresses the following questions/topics:
Describe specific qualitative methods and tools that could be used within your discipline to gather data. Include your rationale.
Evaluate their effectiveness with respect to certain areas within your discipline.
Include company or organizational examples within your essay, as relevant.
In your opinion, what is the future of qualitative research both within your discipline and in general?
Your APA-formatted response must be a minimum of three pages (not including the title page and the reference page) and must include an introduction, a thesis statement (concise summary of the main point of the paper), and a clear discussion of the questions/topics above. Your response must include a minimum of two credible references. All sources used must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations.
For step-by-step instructions for formatting a paper in APA style, please refer to the CSU Citation Guide at http://www.columbiasouthern.edu/downloads/pdf/success/citation-guide. Instructions for formatting formal documents can be found on page 17.

Team performance, productivity, and rewarding teamwork. Based on your understanding, discuss the following.
Discuss how to access team productivity:
What conditions need to be in place for teams to excel and why?
Suggestion ways to design teamwork so that threats to performance is minimized
As a manager, how would you reward teamwork?
I need this to be more then 300 words of discussion and two reply for the topic.
I need this with zero plagarism
Needs the references

CO5119 Business Law
Assignment 2
Instructions to Students
This assignment carries 30% of the marks for this subject.
The word limit is1,500 wordsand the front cover of your assignment should note the total word count used.
This assignment is intended to provide you with the opportunity to consider a range of legal issues that can arise in contract and/or negligence in the course of carrying on a business and to develop your ability to research and analyse problems from the perspective of those legal issues. You are expected to think through the issues thoroughly, considerallparties’ rights and liabilities and provide a reasoned solution to the problems posed by the facts. In particular, you will need to ensure that you cover each of the specific matters that are set out in the question.
The Question (ANSWER ALL PARTS)
Part (a)
Paul was playing golf with two friends at his local golf course in a weekend golf competition. Paul hit a drive and proceeded to walk forwards along the fairway towards where his golf ball landed. Paul was approximately 50 metres from Wayne when Wayne decided to hit his golf ball. Wayne thought it was safe to hit because Paul was near a line of trees that provided some cover. Unfortunately Paul is hit in the face by Wayne’s golf ball.
Paul is considering bringing legal proceedings against Wayne.
REQUIRED
Will Paul be successful if he brings legal proceedings against Wayne? In your answer refer to relevant sections of theCivil Liability Act2003 (Qld) and to any relevant case law.
(10 marks)
Part (b)
Paul is also considering bringing legal proceedings against the Golf Club. He believes that the Club should have installed protective fencing to allow players and spectators to safely move along the side of fairways without being struck by golf balls. However the club say that they cannot be liable because they are protected by wording that appeared on the back of a scorecard.
Peter, who was playing golf with Wayne and Paul when Paul got hit, was handed a scorecard by the Golf Club. The scorecard contained the wording:
“This golf club accepts no responsibility for any loss, harm, injury or death howsoever suffered by any person that enters this golf course”
The writing on the back of the scorecard was particularly small and Paul has difficulty seeing small print. Further, Paul states that he never saw that scorecard. Although, Paul is a regular player at the course and has on numerous occasions been the player responsible for keeping score by using scorecards supplied by the Club (that contained the exact same wording on the back of the card).
REQUIRED
Does the wording on the scorecard protect the Golf Club from liability in relation to the injury Paul has sustained?
(10 marks)
Part (c)
Worse is still to come for Paul. Paul does not seek any medical treatment for his injuries. He believes he merely has some slight concussion and a bad scar from the incident. However, after two weeks his eye sight starts to deteriorate. It turns out that there has been some permanent damage to his left eye as a result of the incident.
A specialist report from medical professionals reveals that if Paul received treatment in relation to his eye within 48 hours after the incident he may have avoided permanent damage.
Paul is furious because his weakened eyesight means that he can no longer work as a commercial airline pilot. Paul retires from his job as a pilot.
Without the income from his job, Paul is forced to sell his investment property. Paul believes that the housing market is at a 5 year low. Paul’s real estate agent told Paul that if he was able to hold onto his investment property for another 12 months he would make $50,000 more on the sale. Paul says he must sell to cover his living expenses.
Paul believes he is entitled to an order for damages resulting from the incident at the Golf Club. Paul wants to claim all his future medical expenses in relation to his left eye, plus 10 years’ worth of lost income (he was due to retire in 10 years), plus $50,000 loss resulting from the early sale of his investment property.
REQUIRED
Advise Paul regarding damages. Which amounts can Paul claim as damages resulting from the incident at the Golf Club?
(10 marks)

Paper , Order, or Assignment Requirements
. Critique an evaluation plan by sharing at least one strength and one area of improvement.
Review and evaluate the uploaded powerpoint presentation below.Reminder:
1 page onlyPut APA citation and at least 1 reference dated 2011 to 2016.Master Plan of Evaluation Summary
The Master Plan of Evaluation for the Southeast group as it relates to Navicent Health’s central line-associated bloodstream infection, CLABSI, project begins with the Director of Staff Development using the Quality Assurance Model to evaluate the program’s Mission, Vision and Philosophy. The Director of Staff Development will ensure the Program’s Mission, Vision, and Philosophy are congruent with that of the organization. A checklist is completed to perform this evaluation.
The next level of evaluation involves individual courses. The courses will be evaluated by the Course Facilitator. He/She will again follow the Quality Assurance Model using competency checklists to ensure the learning objectives will be met for each student. The courses containing simulation components will be videotaped. These videotapes will be evaluated by the Course Facilitator to provide simulation debriefing and objective feedback to students (Cheng et al., 2014).
At the end of the training sessions, students will be asked to complete a checklist indicating their comfort level with the material. This will enable to Course Facilitator to gather data for future course improvements. Students will also be asked to evaluate the training using the Quality Assurance Model with an ultimate goal of determining teaching effectiveness.
In order to determine the effectiveness of the overall program, CLABSI rates must be recorded and tracked. The Infection Control Department will evaluate the CLABSI rate monitoring the rates for pediatric, adult and neonatal intensive care units as well as the pediatric and adult medical-surgical units. They will know the baseline rate one year rate prior to the CLABSI program and will be able to compare the rates after the CLABSI program was implemented.
Justification of Evaluation Design
The overall evaluation philosophy that guides the development of the master plan of evaluation is driven by this program’s objective of reducing the CLABSI rate at Navicent Health (Billings & Halstead, 2016). The success of this program is tied back to this primary objective, and for that reason a Quality Assurance Model is selected to assist in evaluating the program (Billings & Halstead, 2016). The Quality Assurance Model guides the evaluator in the process of program continuous quality improvement and total quality management (Billings & Halstead, 2016). Izumi (2013), also recommends that giving quality service and striving for excellence are the ethical responsibility of professionals especially nursing staff. Quality Assurance help makes sure people have access to quality care and that customer needs and expectations are met by nursing staff to provide adequate and appropriate care. The CLABSI program at Navicent Health will help ensure these goals are achieved by providing quality, meeting the expectations of the patient, family, management and the regulatory body (Izumi, 2013).
This program is meant to evolve and continuously adapt so the CLABSI rate stays below national benchmarks. Benchmarking is an important part of this program, and involves comparing baseline CLABSI rates at Navicent Health to similar facilities nationally (Billings & Halstead, 2016). Baseline CLABSI data also serves as a benchmark to compare future CLABSI data to.
Master Plan of Evaluation Reference in Powerpoint
The master plan of evaluation for Navicent Health’s CLABSI education curriculum is located on slides 14-18.
Summary
Program evaluation is crucial in the success of a program. Formative and summative evaluation allows program educators the ability to determine teaching success and student learning outcomes for program effectiveness. Benchmarking and the Quality Assurance Model allow the program to evaluate whether it is successful at decreasing the CLABSI rate at Navicent Health. Evaluation is an essential method to provide educators with information to determine “value, worth, or quality” of the program (Keating, 2015).
References
Billings, D. M., & Halstead, J. A. (2016). Teaching in nursing: A guide for faculty (5th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
Cheng, A., Eppich, W., Grant, V., Sherbino, J., Zendejas, B., & Cook, D. A. (2014).
Debriefing for technology-enhanced simulation: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. Medical Education in Review, 48(7), 657-666. doi:10.1111/medu.12432
Izumi, S. (2013). Quality improvement in nursing: Administrative mandate or professional
responsibility? Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3491580/
Keating, S. B. (Ed.). (2015). Curriculum development and evaluation in nursing (3rd ed.). New
York, NY: Springer.