Law Debate 2, law homework help

CONSIDER: Seeing an advertisement in a magazine, a man orders an expensive “miniature audiovisual receiver.” When the item arrives, it turns out to be a cheap portable TV. False advertising or mail fraud—on what ground would you base your complaint if you were the plaintiff in the case?
If the company takes the defense of good faith, asserting there was no intent to defraud, does that nullify the charge of mail fraud? Why or why not? What would be your arguments or evidence against their defense?
TOPIC: Whether or not false advertising and mail fraud have occurred and, if so, whether the defense of good faith applies. NOTE: You may find that some facts are missing from the hypothetical. You should formulate your discussion and argument based on the facts presented. You may indicate in your posts that you feel like you need more information in order to make an informed decision. However, you must still present an argument based on the relevant law that you find.

I’m group 2 and here are the instructions on how to debate it.Group 2: The Opposition Group (good faith applies, no crime) will begin to post on the fifth day of the week at noon, with the group leader posting a reply to the group leader of Group 1. This initial reply must be 50 words (or less) stating: (1) the legal position of the group (2) the argument against the initial Group 1 post (3) the legal reasoning behind the argument