new

In this assignment, you will begin preparing for your Psychology Research Paper, due in Week 4.
Choose a topic from the Research Topic List that is relevant, current, newsworthy, and has mass appeal.
Create an outline of the main points, I., II., III., etc., and subpoints, A., B., C., etc. Model your outline to the one shown on page 3 of the Sample Outline document.
Include APA-formatted citations of the scholarly sources you plan to use:

Put an in-text citation next to a main point or subpoint, as necessary.
Include a list of source citations below the outline.

Submit your completed assignment as a Word document.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.The post new first appeared on Nursing School Essays.

Summary: Journaling allows students to express thoughts and feelings regarding aspects of the weekly clinical experience. It is not an account of tasks performed but rather a way of one-to-one communication with your instructor of your innermost feelings about your day of patient care. It is difficult for instructors to recognize all challenges or successes that a student might experience. Your journal offers the instructor a chance to give you support through feedback. During this course you will keep a self-reflective journal. Entries are to be made at the beginning and at the end of the course using the Journal Tool in D2L. Directions: You are required to submit 2 journals: For journal #2: due week 8 Create an entry that synthesizes and identifies the key components of the course for you. Discuss how this will be implemented into your new role as an advanced practice nurse. Identify challenges you encountered with the course, or course content. Identify 2-4 positive or negative thoughts, feelings, or emotions that occurred as a result of any knowledge and practice change that you have experienced at the end of the course Submit 1-2 pages

Summary:
Journaling allows students to express thoughts and feelings regarding aspects of the weekly clinical experience. It is not an account of tasks performed but rather a way of one-to-one communication with your instructor of your innermost feelings about your day of patient care. It is difficult for instructors to recognize all challenges or successes that a student might experience. Your journal offers the instructor a chance to give you support through feedback.
During this course you will keep a self-reflective journal. Entries are to be made at the beginning and at the end of the course using the Journal Tool in D2L.
Directions:
You are required to submit 2 journals:
For journal #2: due week 8
Create an entry that synthesizes and identifies the key components of the course for you.
Summary:
Journaling allows students to express thoughts and feelings regarding aspects of the weekly clinical experience. It is not an account of tasks performed but rather a way of one-to-one communication with your instructor of your innermost feelings about your day of patient care. It is difficult for instructors to recognize all challenges or successes that a student might experience. Your journal offers the instructor a chance to give you support through feedback.
During this course you will keep a self-reflective journal. Entries are to be made at the beginning and at the end of the course using the Journal Tool in D2L.
Directions:
You are required to submit 2 journals:
For journal #2: due week 8
Create an entry that synthesizes and identifies the key components of the course for you.
Discuss how this will be implemented into your new role as an advanced practice nurse.
Identify challenges you encountered with the course, or course content.
Identify 2-4 positive or negative thoughts, feelings, or emotions that occurred as a result of any knowledge and practice change that you have experienced at the end of the course
Submit 1-2 pages
Identify challenges you encountered with the course, or course content.
Identify 2-4 positive or negative thoughts, feelings, or emotions that occurred as a result of any knowledge and practice change that you have experienced at the end of the course
Submit 1-2 pages

Personality Perspectives Paper | Nursing School Essays

Write a 700- to1,050-word paper comparing the main themes of the social-cognitive perspectivewith the humanistic perspective.

Describe the main concepts involved in each perspective.
Explain how the perspectives differ from one another.
Identify possible limitations of each perspective.

Include aminimum of 2 peer-reviewed articles.
Format citationsin your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected.

Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
Review the Work Environment Assessment Template.
Reflect on the output of your Discussion post regarding your evaluation of workplace civility and the feedback received from colleagues.
Select and review one or more of the following articles found in the Resources:
Clark, Olender, Cardoni, and Kenski (2011)
Clark (2018)
Clark (2015)
Griffin and Clark (2014)
The Assignment (3-6 pages total):
Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages)
Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion.
Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.
Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.
Explain what the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace.
Part 2: Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages)
Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected.
Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.
Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages)
Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
Incivility at the workplace is common in nursing education and clinical practice (Clark, Olender, Cardoni, & Kenski, 2011). Workplace incivility can be defined as repeated offensive, disrespectful, or discouraging behavior, misuse of power, or unfair punishments that make the receiver distressed and feel shamed; creating strain; and decreasing the employee’s self-confidence (Warner, Sommers, Zappa, & Thornlow, 2016). Uncivil behaviors can appear in different forms and may cause profound effects on their recipients.
The work environment assessment of my workplace resulted in a score 35. According to Clark (2015), a score below 50 in the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory indicates a very unhealthy work environment. It is surprising that two statements where the organization scored the highest were those that stated individuals and collective achievements are celebrated and publicized ; and that use of effective conflicts resolution skills, (Clark, 2015). The publicity and celebration of individual and collective achievements is a new thing that has just been initiated and we are going strong with it. The staffs are vastly knowledgeable on conflicts resolutions. The organization is neutral on communication, living by shared vision and employee are treated in fair and respectful manner. Somewhat untrue about communication. The organization scored low in all other aspect of the assessment.
Going by this score form Workplace assessment, I will say the organization is a very unhealthy place. We discuss this almost every day with other staff in my department. Unhealthy place is not safe for both staff and even patients Communication is very poor. Nobody has the idea of when decisions are made which means staffs are excluded from decision making. The staff feels that Patient’s acuity is not put into consideration before staffing is made which made the workload voluminous and makes the environment unsafe. Staff from other departments with no basic knowledge of crisis prevention intervention are been thrown to the psychiatry units. The staff doesn’t feel supported by the management. The organization is not able to retain staff because the salary is not competitive enough and are not true to their words in terms of benefits, so there is very high turnover of staff. Only few staff has stayed for more than 2 years. Most new staff leaves between 2 weeks and 6 months.
One occasion of incivility that I have experienced was when the supervisor spoke to me in a disrespectful manner because one unidentified person called from ER and asked if we had an extra mental health worker and I responded no. She said I was being unfair and there is a reason while they called for a help. I requested to speak to her in the staff room with one other staff that was with me when the call came in . She apologized after I had expressed myself because we were never staff with an extra staff. I couldn’t have sent any staff to ER because I have an agency staff working with me who does know these patients. I could have created an unsafe place for patient and the staffs when we were already short staff and an agency staff?.
To create a high-performance team, implementation of strategies to improve work environment safety is necessary . To create an even stronger work team, it is vital that establishing excellent communication between employees be present in the organization. Respect and professional communication in a healthcare organization produces improved outcomes for patients and more civil employees (Griffin & Clark, 2014).
References
Clark, C. M. (2015). Conversations to inspire and promote a more civil workplace. American Nurse Today, 10(11), 18-23. Retrieved fromhttps://www.americannursetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ant11-CE-Civility-1023.pdf
Clark, C. M., Olender, L., Cardoni, C., & Kenski, D. (2011). Fostering civility in nursing education and practice: Nurse leaders perspective. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 41(7/8), 324-330. doi:10.1097/NNA.0b013e31822509c4
Griffin, M., & Clark, C. M. (2014). Revisiting cognitive rehearsal as an intervention against incivility and lateral violence in nursing: 10 years later. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 45(12), 535-542. doi:10.3928/00220124-20141122-02
Warrner, J., Sommers, K., Zappa, M., & Thornlow, D. (2016). Decreasing workplace incivility. Nursing Management, 47(1), 22-30. doi: 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000475622.91398.c3

Using Mixed Methods to Evaluate Counseling Services

Use your Royse, Thyer, and Padgett text, Program Evaluation, to complete the following:

Read Chapter 4, “Qualitative and Mixed Methods in Evaluation,” pages 93–109.
Read Chapter 7, “Client Satisfaction,” pages 193–207.

Use the Capella University Library to complete the following:

Read Bennett, Riger, Schewe, Howard, and Wasco’s 2004 article, “Effectiveness of Hotline, Advocacy, Counseling, and Shelter Services for Victims of Domestic Violence: A Statewide Evaluation,” in Journal of Interpersonal Violence, volume 19, issue 7, pages 815–829. The authors describe the evolution of a plan to assess outcomes in their community’s hotline, advocacy, counseling, and shelter services for victims of domestic violence.
Read Chenail’s 2011 article, “How to Conduct Clinical Qualitative Research on the Patient’s Experience,” in Qualitative Report, volume 16, issue 4, pages 1173–1190.

Using Mixed Methods to Evaluate Counseling Services
Resources
.
In the Bennett, Riger, Schewe, Howard, and Wasco (2004) article assigned in this unit, the authors describe the evolution of their plan to assess outcomes in their community’s hotline, advocacy, counseling, and shelter services for victims of domestic violence. After reviewing the article, address the following: This post needs to be supported with at least 4 references

What qualitative data did the authors choose to evaluate?
What quantitative data did they choose to evaluate?
Critique the authors’ rationale and final decision, referencing considerations offered from the assigned chapters from your textbook. Do you agree or disagree with their rationale?
What additional information about clients’ experience would have been valuable, and how could it have been collected? See the 2011 Chenail article assigned for this unit for possibilities.

Analyze factors that contribute to the growth of economic inequality.

Introduction
Inequality is a central concept in sociology. Every society has a stratification system—an arrangement of society into groups that are unequal with regard to things valued in that society. In the United States, for example, we stratify people based on social class (or how much income and wealth they have). Our location within the stratification system impacts much of our lives. How would your life be different if you came from a family with billions of dollars? Would you have gone to the same school? Played with the same toys? Gone on the same vacations?
While inequality exists in every society, it tends to be different as to how it is structured according to time period or location. In earlier times, inequality was based on who owned the land. Today, it is shaped by a variety of factors including income, wealth, gender, race/ethnicity, age, and ability status. For example, women and some racial/ethnic groups make less for the same work as males. Despite this, we have a tendency in the United States to believe that neither social class nor class conflict exist. Unfortunately, research and data suggest otherwise. We still have a division of people based on their income and wealth, with some at the top and others at the bottom. While we belong to a wealthy, industrially developed country, poverty still exists.
Sociologists examine these issues of poverty and inequality in a society and try to better understand why structures of inequality exist in society. Do you think inequality is always going to exist? Focus on this as you delve into the resources and prepare for the assessment.
Demonstration of Proficiency
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
Competency 3: Explain the significance of social inequality for the individual and society.
Explain whether or not economic inequality is inevitable.
Propose strategies to reduce inequality.
Competency 5: Analyze the impact of social change on society and social institutions.
Examine potential changes to increase equality of opportunity.
Analyze factors that contribute to the growth of economic inequality.
Competency 6: Compose text that articulates meaning relevant to its purpose and audience.
Develop text using organization, structure, and transitions that demonstrate understanding of cohesion between main and subtopics.
American culture emphasizes self-sufficiency and working hard to get where you want. It is assumed that everyone has the ability to succeed if they work hard enough. For this assessment, write a paper applying key concepts regarding social stratification to argue for or against the inevitability of economic inequality. While there are many forms of inequality in the United States, for this assessment we will be focusing solely on economic inequality.
Deliverable
Write an essay in which you complete all of the following:
Part 1: Explain whether or not you think economic inequality is inevitable.
Respond to the question: Is economic inequality inevitable? Why or why not?
Part 2: Analyze factors that contribute to growing economic inequality.
Analyze what factors have contributed to the growth of economic inequality in the past few decades. What factors cause economic inequality?
Propose strategies to reduce economic inequality.
Part 3: Examine ways to increase equality of opportunity.
Reflect on ideas of equal opportunity and analyze why or why not you think American society provides everyone with an equal opportunity for success.
Examine what kinds of changes would help establish greater equality of opportunity for everyone in American society.​​​​
Additional Requirements
Written communication: Develop text using organization, structure, and transitions that demonstrate understanding of cohesion between main and subtopics. Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
Sources: Cite at least three scholarly sources.
Length: 3–4 pages, not including title and reference pages.
Format: Include a title page and reference page. Use in-text citations to cite your sources. [Example: Writing becomes better as the child matures (Britton, Thomas, & Miller, 1996).]
Font and size: Times New Roman, 12-point.

Assignment Resources and Links – Class Assignments Help

AssignmentTemplates/Assignment 4.html
INSR-6007 Discussion #3InstructionsRead the article “Damages on Tap” and answer the following questions;
Draft an argument, using at least five (5) valid positions as noted in this article, for reform of joint and several liability involving municipalities. Draft one (1) argument in favour of remaining as it is.
How to Submit your AssignmentPost your answers to Online Discussion #3 by 11.59 pm on Sunday
Grading CriteriaAccess the Rubric for Online Discussions.docx
Assignment Resources and LinksDirect link to article mentioned above

Documents/Rubric for Online Discussions.docxRubric for Online Discussions / Assignments # ___ Name ___________________________________________ Score: _____________
Outstanding
Good
Fair
Acceptable
Not Completed
Thinking / Reflection
Arguments are pertinent to the topic. Arguments are logical and supported with evidence. Highly informative and easy to understand. Appropriate vocabulary is used.
Arguments are pertinent to the topic. Arguments are fairly logical and reasonably supported. Arguments are informative, complete and understandable. Appropriate vocabulary is used.
Arguments are not consistently pertinent, logical or supported. Somewhat informative and understandable.
Arguments not pertinent. Arguments rarely, if at all, logical and supported. Not very informative and understandable.
No evidence.
Structure
There is a logical flow to the topics / arguments. Conclusion flows clearly from the arguments presented.
Discussion is fairly well organized. Conclusion flows from the rest of the discussion.
Discussion weakly organized. Conclusion is acceptable.
Discussion is not organized. Conclusion doesn’t flow from the rest of the discussion.
No evidence.
Interest Factor
Language and style are appropriate for intended audience. Main points are memorable. Reader is very engaged. Discussion presents well developed analysis and synthesis. Clearly demonstrates critical thinking.
Language and style of discussion appropriate. Reader is engaged. Discussion presents reasonable analysis and synthesis. Demonstrates critical thinking.
Language and style only fair. Reader is only somewhat engaged. Less-developed analysis and synthesis. Critical thinking is abstract and hard to follow.
Language and style are poor. Reader finds it hard to follow. Analysis and synthesis lacking. There is little evidence of critical thinking.
No evidence.
Conclusion
The conclusion is engaging and reflects personal learning.
The conclusion restates the learning.
The conclusion does not adequately restate the learning.
Incomplete and/or unfocused.
Not applicable.
Mechanics
No errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. No errors in sentence structure and word usage.
Almost no errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. Almost no errors in sentence structure and word usage.
Many errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. Many errors in sentence structure and word usage.
Numerous and distracting errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. Numerous and distracting errors in sentence structure and word usage.
Not applicable.

Define a bivariate relationship.

Define a bivariate relationship.
The post Define a bivariate relationship. appeared first on Class Assignments Help.
Define a bivariate relationship. was first posted on September 22, 2022 at 7:42 am.©2019 "Class Assignments Help". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at [email protected]

An executive summary that clearly and succinctly describes the performance of the project and any… 1 answer below »

Assessment 3: Individual Project Closure ReportDue Date: 18 May 2019• An electronic copy of this report is required.• Any documents created in Excel or Microsoft Project must be included in the final file uploaded.• Please use the Project Management Plan template provided, as the basis of your assignment. Please delete the Sections not required for this assignment.Task:Develop a Project Closure Repot with a focus on:1. An executive summary that clearly and succinctly describes the performance of the project and any outstanding actions.2. Provides details of the performance of the project cost, time and scope compared to the baseline in the Project Management Plan.3. Provides a perspective from the Project Sponsor and Project Manager on the performance of the project.3,000 words.Presentation: Please use the Project Closure Report template provided.In addition, provide a minimum 250 words on what you have learned during this course.Scope:This assignment will assess your understanding of the process, value and outcomes of completing a formal closure of a Project, using the principles identified in Project Integration Management.The assignment should compare the completed project against the planned project (e.g. what you would expect in the Project Management Plan. Some other key points to remember…

Each container holds 30 parts, and 8 containers are authorized. How much daily demand can be… 1 answer below »

Gestalt, Inc., uses a kanban system in its automobile production facility in Germany. This facility operates 8 hours per day to produce the Jitterbug, a replacement for the obsolete but immensely popular Jitney Beetle. Suppose that a certain part requires 150 seconds of processing at machine cell 33B and a container of parts average 1.6 hours of waiting time there. Management allows a 10 percent buffer for unexpected occurrences. Each container holds 30 parts, and 8 containers are authorized. How much daily demand can be satisfied with this system? (Hint: Recall that 0 is the average processing time per container, not per individual part.)