negative attitude of healthcare professionals towards borderline personality disorder Hi, i would like you to write a dissertation 8000 words. please do not use american english, no colloquialism as last paper i receive comment about colloquialism . Harvard referencing. please use 10 -12 research article in the topic given for the literature review to criticise. Research article should be for the past 5 years if not can go a bit above. School of health Sciences Academic level: 6 Assessment Task: Students will complete a dissertation comprising a comprehensive literature review and a research proposal related to an area of interest within the student’s scope of practice. Students will not be expected to undertake the research proposed. The word count of the dissertation = 8000 words Percentage: 100% ?
Learning Outcomes All learning outcomes for this module are listed below. The module learning outcomes that are being assessed through this assessment task have been highlighted with *. ?? Demonstrate a critical awareness of the key ethical issues in research and the role of ethics committees, as well as the principles of ‘good clinical practice’ within clinical research* ?? Appraise where different types of research sit within the hierarchy of evidence and the application of evidence to practice guidelines and policy* ??
Critically appraise qualitative research design, methods and analysis* ?? Critically appraise quantitative research design, methods and analysis including basic statistics* ?? Demonstrate understanding of research policy and funding, and the ‘research architecture’ of the NHS ?? Explain the benefits and importance of patient and public involvement in research ?? Utilise an appropriate search strategy to retrieve, review and critically appraise information and published literature within your field of practice and develop a research proposal* ?? Demonstrate the ability to work independently and take responsibility for seeking guidance in relation to completion of a literature review and research proposal* The following assessment criteria and guidance gives an indication as to how each outcome can be achieved:
1. Ability to identify and introduce a suitable topic ?? The extent to which you have clearly defined the topic area or problem for the focus of your dissertation ?? Ability to explain the relevance of the topic and its importance to practice. The introduction should set the context with reference to relevant background policy or theory
2. The quality of the literature review ?? Is the purpose of the literature review clear and is it appropriate to the chosen topic? ?? Ability to select and use an effective strategy to identify appropriate evidence relevant to the chosen topic within an area ?? How well you discuss the evidence and information currently available and consider how it helps to illuminate the topic or problem you have chosen ??
The depth and breadth of knowledge and your ability to critically appraise, rather than simply describe the evidence. This must include a discussion of the strengths and limitations of different study designs, methods or theories used in the evidence base. ?? How well the review is structured in terms of coherent themes or key issues identified ?? Ability to identify gaps in the evidence-base and to demonstrate how you have used the knowledge you have gained through the literature to support and justify the proposed research
3. The appropriateness and clarity of the research proposal ?? Ability to select and justify an appropriate research study that follows on from the gaps identified in the literature review ?? Clarity of research question/s or aims and objectives ?? How well you have described and justified the proposed research approach or paradigm (e.g. qualitative, quantitative or mixed method) ?? How well you have described your chosen study design, methodology, methods, sampling and study procedures and discussed the strengths and limitations of these.
This should include any measures to manage validity, credibility or the robustness of the research. ?? How well you have considered use of data collection tools (such as interview schedules, questionnaire etc.) and addressed how results will be analysed ?? The extent to which you have discussed the ethical issues that may arise in relation to your proposed research and how these would be managed ?? Consideration for the governance procedures that the research would need to comply with. Relevant forms, such as consent forms and participant information sheets should be included in the appendices. ?? Address how you would include patient or public involvement within your research and why ?? How insightful is the discussion of the potential impact of the findings and how they will be disseminated ?? Consideration given to project costing and project planning/timeline
4. Level of original insight, independent thinking and clarity of presentation ?? The extent to which you demonstrate original thinking, insight and the ability to make links between research evidence and practice. ?? Completed progress record sheets included in the appendix Finally, we will consider how well the dissertation is structured, how fluent the work is and the clarity of the arguments presented. Comments:

Advance Information Management in Health care Introduction: Current and emerging technologies in healthcare provide nurses with the opportunity to improve patient outcomes through ever-increasing access to data and evidence. Decisions made at both the point of care and the organizational level are impacted by information support systems. Nurses prepared at the master’s level fill a key role in leading unit and organizational change that incorporates these emerging technologies into the improvement of patient safety and quality of care. This assessment consists of evaluating two key roles commonly expected of the master’s-prepared nurse: (1) shaping and guiding a group process as the identified leader of a project team and (2) evaluating the project team’s products and synthesizing that work into a written proposal and presentation designed to be delivered to the executive leadership team of the healthcare system. Scenario: You are a clinical nurse specialist with a Post-Masters Nursing Informatics Certificate working in a 100-bed community hospital that is still using paper documentation. You lead a multidisciplinary team comprised of hospital professional staff. You have been assigned the task of investigating and recommending a new computerized management system that will bring the hospital in compliance with meaningful use legislation. Requirements: A. Write a proposal for a new information management system to implement meaningful use by doing the following: 1. Describe your project committee by doing the following: a. Identify four or more interdisciplinary team members to be on the project committee, including each team member’s title and position in the organization. b. Describe the role each team member will play in the implementation of the system. c. Explain why each team member’s expertise is necessary for the success of this project. 2. Choose two real-life computerized management systems and analyze the two systems by doing the following: a. Summarize the advantages and disadvantages of the two systems. b. Recommend which system is the best choice to meet meaningful use requirements in this particular setting. c. Describe how the features of the recommended system meet the guidelines outlined in the three stages of meaningful use. d. Describe how the recommended system will impact patient care and documentation. e. Explain how using the recommended system to access information will impact the quality and delivery of nursing care and patient outcomes. 3. Discuss how the proposed system and adoption of meaningful use will benefit the organization by doing the following: a. Provide two examples of ways that quality improvement (QI) data collected from the system can be gathered and tracked to identify the occurrence of problems and errors. b. Discuss security standards and methods, including the need for data storage integrity and data backup and recovery. c. Explain how the recommended system will protect patient privacy. d. Explain how the recommended system meets Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) requirements. e. Describe how adopting the system will reduce costs to the organization, including standardizing documentation, reducing waste, and increasing productivity and factors that address human and capital resources. 4. Explain why active nursing involvement in the planning, selection, and implementation of the systems is important to the success of the implementation process and meeting meaningful use requirements. B. Create a multi-media presentation (i.e., PowerPoint or Keynote; Prezi will not be accepted) presentation for the executive leadership team that summarizes a plan for implementing the new information management system. Address the following in your presentation: 1. Explain how hospital staff will be trained to use the new system by addressing each of the following questions: ● Who will train the staff? ● What will be included in the training? ● When and how frequently will training sessions take place? ● Where will the training sessions take place? 2. Discuss a plan for implementation (e.g., the launch date, initial rollout, modified workloads, and/or onsite user-support). 3. Discuss a plan for incidences of system failure. Note: Include presenter notes for slides as appropriate in order to fully cover the level of explanation, analysis, and discussion necessary. C. When you use sources, include all in-text citations and references in APA format. Note: For definitions of terms commonly used in the rubric, see the Rubric Terms web link included in the Evaluation Procedures section. Note: When using sources to support ideas and elements in an assessment, the submission MUST include APA formatted in-text citations with a corresponding reference list for any direct quotes or paraphrasing. It is not necessary to list sources that were consulted if they have not been quoted or paraphrased in the text of the assessment. Note: No more than a combined total of 30% of a submission can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from outside sources, even if cited correctly. For tips on using APA style, please refer to the APA Handout web link included in the APA Guidelines section.

Strategic Plan Strategic Planning Healthcare Management Class Section 1 Health Service Organization: STRYKER (stryker.com) This paper is being done by a team so I am responsible for researching “Service Area Competitor Analysis” section below for the company Stryker & Internal Environmental Analysis Stryker Corporation in Michigan, USA produces a variety of medical technology products and hospital equipment such as stretcher. One of Stryker’s main competitors in providing a complete line of emergency handling equipment such as the “stretcher” or gurneys is Ferno-Washington. Please research the competitor analysis on FERNO- WASHINGTON who is Stryker’s main competitor in emergency medical services. Please use only reputable references sources such as journal articles. APA format with reference page. See instructions below.
Competitor Analysis. There are likely multiple competitors in your service area. However, for this exercise, please research Ferno- Washington which is Stryker’s main competitor in Emergency Medical Service. Then, identify the strengths and weaknesses of the competitor. This section should be at least (1) full page. Section 2 Internal Environmental Analysis- Service Delivery. For purposes of this exercise, please analyze the point-of-service. In your analysis of the point-of-service, first identify the strengths and weaknesses. Point of Service Strengths Weaknesses Next, evaluate the competitive relevance for strengths and weaknesses by determining the value, rareness, imitability, and sustainability of resources, competencies, and capabilities at the point of service. Point of Service Resources Competencies Capabilities Value (High or Low) Are the resources related to point of service of high value or low value? Are the competencies related to point of service of high value or low value? Are the capabilities related to point of service of high value or low value? Rare (Yes or No) Are the resources related to point of service rare? Are the competencies related to point of service rare?
Are the capabilities related to point of service rare? Imitability (Difficult or Easy) Are the resources related to point of service easy or difficult to imitate? Are the competencies related to point of service easy or difficult to imitate? Are the capabilities related to point of service easy or difficult to imitate? Sustainability (Yes or No) Are the resources related to point of service sustainable? Are the competencies related to point of service sustainable? Are the capabilities related to point of service sustainable? Resources – are the stocks of human and nonhuman factors that are available for use in producing goods and services (i.e. tangible = land, labor, or capital; intangible = intellectual property, reputation, and goodwill). Competency – the collective knowledge and skills possessed by individuals may be a source of sustained competitive advantage for the organization. Capabilities – an organization’s ability to deploy resources and competencies, usually in combination, to produce desired services. Capabilities fall into one of the following two categories: ? The ability to make dynamic improvements to the organization’s activities through learning, renewal, and change over time; or ? The ability to develop strategic insights and recognize and arrange resources and competencies OR to develop novel strategies before or better than competitors. Third, based on this evaluation, identify if the point-of-service for your health service organization is a competitive strength or weakness. This section should be two (2) pages.

Case Study 1: Software Requirement Specification
Due Week 5 and worth 100 pointsRead the case study titled “A Patient Information System for Mental Health Care”, located in Chapter 1 of your textbook.Write a paper in which you:
Create a Software Requirement Specification (SRS) that includes the following:
A detailed description of both user and system requirements. At least four user requirements and four system requirements should be provided.A detailed description of both functional and nonfunctional requirements. At least four functional requirements and four nonfunctional requirements should be provided.A detailed requirement specification written in structured natural language.
Structure and present the requirements in a logical and consistent manner.Design the security control assessment matrix to identify the risk and risk-reduction techniques to secure the system.Develop a use case diagram to summarize the functional requirements of the system through the use of Microsoft Visio.
Your assignment must follow these requirements:
Fully develop your ideas: While there is no specific page requirement, students are expected to fully develop their ideas using business communication language. This means you must demonstrate to your professor you have absorbed the material and understand it. A statement of fact should be supported by two or three sentences. A paragraph should only contain one idea. A fully developed idea doesn’t mean an exhaustive explanation in which students write everything they know, just enough to get the point across to the reader.Make sure you do your own work: Never copy and paste material from the Internet unless the assignment specifically calls for that. When you do make a statement of fact, you should cite your source. You can support the fact with a quote, but use these sparingly. Most of what you submit should be your own work.Download the cover page and lorem ipsum outline with the proper formatting template from here. Use that with your submission.Include charts or diagrams created in Visio. The completed diagrams / charts must be imported into the Word document before the paper is submitted.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Illustrate the ability to use modern software engineering tools.Customize software solutions using software engineering principles.Apply project management techniques to manage resources and issues in software engineering.Write clearly and concisely about software engineering using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions.