Nursing Research Utilization Project Proposal ________________________________________
1. Complete Section A: Problem Identification (Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI). The central line care bundle practices were implemented in Critical Care in June 2012 and the compliance to the use of all the elements of the central line care bundle had been low. Identify a work-setting problem (Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI). Describe a problem or issue that needs a solution. ? Provide support that the problem or issue is an important one to solve (include statistics). ? State a project objective that is specific, realistic, and measureable. ? Describe briefly the proposed solution (Educational Program to educate nursing staff regarding pressure ulcer in home health care setting) and the way in which it will solve the problem or issue
2. Complete Section B: Solution Description (an educational program regarding the elements of the central line care bundle and the empowerment of nurses to hold off on any central line insertion if any of the bundle elements is not adhered to. The educational program will also include Infection Control guidelines as per recommendation of the Center for Disease Control). For nursing staff of Intensive care (Hospital- Kendall Regional Medical Center) Develop a description of the proposed solution. Describe the proposed solution. ? Describe the way(s) in which the proposed solution is consistent with current research knowledge. ? Discuss the feasibility of implementing the proposed solution in the work setting. ? Discuss the way(s) in which the proposed solution is consistent with organization or community culture and resources. . WITH US .

Ekhtiari, Y. S., Shojaeizadeh, D., Foroushani, A. R., Ghofranipour, F., & Ahmadi, B. (2013). The effect of an intervention based on the PRECEDE- PROCEED model on preventive behaviors of domestic violence among Iranian high school girls. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, 15(1), 21–28.
http://www.thecampuscommon.com/library/ezproxy/ticketdemocs.asp?sch=suo&turl=http%3A%2F%2
Fsearch.proquest.com.southuniversity.libproxy.edmc.edu%2Fdocview%2F143140 4596%3Faccountid%3D13931
Respond to the following:
Explain how the PRECEDE-PROCEED model can be used as a major conceptual framework for a public program and how the constructs can be used in the evaluation process.
Differentiate between the two abbreviations of PRECEDE-PROCEED model.
Select the PRECEDE or PROCEED model and examine the 4 phases (e.g., Phases 1–4 cover analysis and identification and Phases 5–8 cover implementation).
Explain how the phases of the selected part of the model can be applied to develop a public health program for your selected health issue or health disease topic.
Write a paragraph to synthesize your information and summarize key points. Comment on the postings of at least two peers with scholarly information.
Evaluation Criteria:
Explained the PRECEDE-PROCEED model including how it can be used as a major conceptual framework for a public program and how the constructs can be used in the evaluation process.
Differentiate between the two abbreviations of PRECEDE-PROCEED model.
Examined in detail the four phases of either PRECEDE or PROCEED.
Explained how the phases of the selected part of the model can be applied to develop a public health program for your selected health issue or health disease topic.
Responses demonstrated an in-depth research and analysis.
Justified your answers with appropriate research and reasoning
Commented on the postings of at least two peers.
Start a New Thread
Discussion
Filter by: All Threads Sort by: Most Recent Activity Least Recent Activity Newest Thread Oldest Thread Author First Name A-Z Author First Name Z-A Author Last Name A-Z Author Last Name Z-A Subject A-Z Subject Z-A There are no threads in this topic.Reflect in ePortfolioPrevious Next

A clinical investigator has developed two new treatments (treatment A and B) for high cholesterol. T Show more A clinical investigator has developed two new treatments (treatment A and B) for high cholesterol. The investigator is not sure which treatment will significantly reduce the average cholesterol level. There were a total of 140 people randomized into the two treatments but some of the participants dropped from treatment B. The investigator wants the level of significance to be fairly stringent at 5%.
1. State the hypothesis the investigator wants to tests. Use mathematics notation (i.e. H0 and HA)
2. What is the additional condition required to use the pooled t-test? Are these met? If not which test should you use? Show less

week 1Law and Morality (graded)People sometimes confuse legality and morality, since (1) breaking the law is not always or necessarily immoral, and (2) just because an action is legal does not guarantee that it is morally right. Without using the examples cited in Chapter 1, share an example of (1) and an example of (2) above. Explain your two choices. Comment on selections made by other students. Do you agree with their positions? Why do you think that the law and morality are sometimes different? Why cant laws always be written to be moral? Ethical Aspects of Non-Compete Clauses (graded)In Idaho, a young doctor agreed to a 10-year, 50-mile radius in her employment contract. Upon leaving the employer’s chiropractor office after five years, she set up a new office, but only went 49.5 miles away, thinking that would satisfy the 50-mile radius requirement.
The employer did not agree and filed for an injunction (which is a court order to prevent the doctor’s actions) to stop the doctor from opening her office. The courts agreed with the employer. The employer was able to enforce the injunction and shut down the young doctor’s new office. The ensuing financial issues grew for the young doctor because she now had signed contracts for the building, equipment, and utilities, but was not able to practice in the location. The 50-mile radius requirement would force the doctor to completely move from the town in which she grew up.
The nearby towns are saturated with doctors and she would not be able to acquire many patients, if any, in those towns. She is now considering leaving medicine altogether. As non-compete clauses have gained popularity, some state courts have moved to deem them invalid altogether, and other states have severely restricted their impact. The ultimate test that the courts have used is the reasonableness of such clauses. What are the various ethical considerations of the impact of the non-compete clause? Do you think that the non-compete clause in this example is reasonable insofar as the combination of distance and length of time? Argue the pros and cons of enforcing this particular clause as it is now written. Are there any professions in which a non-compete clause may be essential?