Gender And Health | Nursing School Essays

Interview someone who has a different cultural background from your own and is of a different gender. Then, self-interview and compare your responses with the person you interviewed. Finally, using both sets of responses, write 3–5 pages in which you examine cross-cultural and cross-gender similarities and differences in health-related behaviors.
According to Huff (1999), conceptions about health and gender held by various ethnic and immigrant groups within the United States may differ from and even contradict the health concepts of the mainstream society. This assessment will give you the opportunity to examine the concept of “being healthy” across cultures and genders, as well as look at how cultural differences inform social policy related to heath care.
Required Resources
The following resources are required to complete the assessment.
Capella Resources
Click the links provided to view the following resources:

Health Behaviors Questionnaire.

Suggested Resources
The following optional resources are provided to support you in completing the assessment or to provide a helpful context. For additional resources, refer to the Research Resources and Supplemental Resources in the left navigation menu of your courseroom.
Library Resources
The following e-books or articles from the Capella University Library are linked directly in this course:

Goldberg, W. A., Kelly, E., Matthews, N. L., Kang, H., Li, W., & Sumaroka, M. (2012). The more things change, the more they stay the same: Gender, culture, and college students’ views about work and family. Journal of Social Issues, 68(4), 814–837.
Perrone-McGovern, K. M., Wright, S. L., Howell, D. S., & Barnum, E. L. (2014). Contextual influences on work and family roles: Gender, culture, and socioeconomic factors. Career Development Quarterly, 62(1), 21–28.
Rüdell, K., & Diefenbach, M. A. (2008). Current issues and new directions in psychology and health: Culture and health psychology. Why health psychologists should care about culture. Psychology & Health, 23(4), 387–390.

Assessment Instructions
Complete the following:

Choose a person to interview from a different cultural background and gender.
Use the Health Behaviors Questionnaire located in the Required Resources to interview your chosen person and yourself.
Write up the responses from both interviews.
Analyze the responses:

What kind of similarities and differences did you find between your definition of “being healthy” and your partner’s definition?
What kind of similarities and differences did you find between your responses and your partner’s responses in the attitudes and behaviors concerning gender?
What, if any, are the cultural values reflected in your responses and your partner’s responses? Analyze any values you discover.
How would you evaluate current psychological research as it relates to understanding culture, gender, and health attitudes?
How can the knowledge of cultural differences inform social policy related to health care?

Additional Requirements

Include a title page and a references page.
Include an introductory paragraph and a concluding paragraph.
Include a minimum of two research resources.
Be sure to follow APA guidelines for style and formatting.
Ensure your finished assessment should be 3–5 pages in length, excluding the title page and references page.

GENDER AND HEALTH SCORING GUIDE GRADING RUBRICCriteria Non-performance Basic Proficient Distinguished Compare and contrast different definitions of health from a cultural perspective. Does not compare and contrast different definitions of health from a cultural perspective. Compares and contrasts different definitions of health from a cultural perspective using inaccurate or incomplete information. Compares and contrasts different definitions of health from a cultural perspective. Compares and contrast different definitions of health from a cultural perspective and analyzes the relationships among the definitions. Compare and contrast gender attitudes and behaviors from a cultural perspective. Does not compare and contrast gender attitudes and behaviors from a cultural perspective. Compares and contrasts gender attitudes and behaviors from a cultural perspective using inaccurate or incomplete information. Compares and contrasts gender attitudes and behaviors from a cultural perspective. Compares and contrasts gender attitudes and behaviors from a cultural perspective and analyzes the relationships among the behaviors. Evaluate current psychological research relating to understanding culture, gender and health attitudes.Does not evaluate current psychological research relating to understanding culture, gender, and health attitudes. Evaluates current psychological research relating to understanding culture, gender, and health attitudes, using inaccurate or incomplete information. Evaluates current psychological research relating to understanding culture, gender, and health attitudes. Evaluates current psychological research relating to understanding culture, gender, and health attitudes, synthesizing foresight and various perspectives on current psychological research. Compare and contrast gender attitudes and behaviors from a cultural perspective. Does not compare and contrast gender attitudes and behaviors from a cultural perspective. Compares and contrasts and contrast gender attitudes and behaviors from a cultural perspective using inaccurate or incomplete information. Compares and contrasts gender attitudes and behaviors from a cultural perspective. Compares and contrasts gender attitudes and behaviors from a cultural perspective and analyzes the relationships between the gender attitudes. Assess how cultural differences inform social policy related to health care.Does not assess social policy related to health care. Assesses social policy related to health care using inaccurate or incomplete information. Assesses social policy related to health care. Assesses social policy related to health care and articulates challenges within the larger legal and societal context. Communicate in a manner that is professional and consistent with expectations for members of the public service profession.Communicates in a manner that is not professional or consistent with expectations for members of the psychology profession. Communicates in a manner that is inconsistent with expectations for members of the psychology profession. Communicates in a manner that is professional and consistent with expectations for members of the psychology profession. Communicates in a manner that is professional, scholarly, and consistent with expectations for members of the psychology profession. Apply proper APA formatting and style.Does not apply proper APA formatting and style. Uses adequate written communication but includes some APA errors and inconsistencies. Applies proper APA formatting and style. Applies scholarly writing and uses proper APA formatting and style throughout the assessment. 

Discuss your honest, personal reactions to the movie. Include discussion of any emotions which you experienced. Be detailed in your response. (5 pt)

Watch the movie Girl, Interrupted and answer the following questions.Girl, Interrupted.Then, answer the following questions in detail. You can number your answers so that it is clear which question you are answering.Discuss two of the disorders which were illustrated in the movie. (1 pt)What symptoms of each disorder were apparent from watching the movie? (1 pt)What symptoms of each disorder were NOT observed in this movie? (1 pt)According to this movie, what are some of the primary causes of each of the disorders? (1 pt)Discuss how treatments for each disorder were presented in the movie. (1 pt)Discuss your honest, personal reactions to the movie. Include discussion of any emotions which you experienced. Be detailed in your response. (5 pt)Your analysis will need to be at least 3 pages. Type your work in a word document and attach it to the Discussion Board forum “Extra credit: Movie analysis”. Your analysis must be submitted by the end of the semester.

What is amphetamine delusional disorder?

I believe you’re talking about Stimulant Psychosis, as I’m quite certain “Amphetamine Delusional Disorder” would be just that, feel free to correct me but I’ll do my best.
Stimulant Psychosis is a Psychosis symptom which typically occurs following an overdose on a CNS stimulant, or constant abuse of a CNS stimulant.
The symptoms of stimulant psychosis are as followed. They also generally include the symptoms of organic psychosis as well.
Hallucinations, Delusions, Aggression, Arrhythmia, dilated pupils, Diarrhea, Hypertension, Hypermedia, Nausea, Rapid breathing, Restlessness, Tremors, Vomiting And in rare cases; Seizures and Catatonia
The symptoms of these can slightly vary depending on the substance ingested.
Yet enough with that.
There are obviously other factors in play than just the symptoms. Such as.
Neurochemistry
It’s important to note a singular person’s neurochemistry as influential factors in cases of stimulant psychosis. an example being those with an abnormal dopamine signaling may be associated with many of the symptoms of stimulant psychosis. Of course the drugs are in most cases the underlying cause, a person may be more susceptible than someone else with dopaminergic abnormalities such as levels in a certain part of the brain and receptor density.
Genetics
It is likely that certain generic abnormalities may increase the chance of stimulant psychosis. Genetic expression may dictate neurotransmitter concentrations and brain activity. Ingesting a certain CNS stimulant may interfere with the expression of these genes, which can induce a state of psychosis. It’s also important to note that dopamine isn’t the only neurotransmitter involved in this.
Dosage
The dose of any substance will dictate the effects and side-effects that someone experiences. In most cases the higher the dose, the more prominent the side effects will be. A majority of people experiencing stimulant psychosis are taking a dose too high (Usually due to a raise in tolerance) for their own well being. Which in tern overwhelms the nervous system, and their brain cannot function with abnormally high dopamine of a prolonged period of time.
Okay I rambled a bit too long, yet if you need any more information, feel free to message me/comment on here, and I’ll gladly add more.

explain contextual factors in the development of the disorder and how the disorder impacts those contextual factors.

Creative Paper: The purpose of this paper is to test your knowledge of the array ofpsychological disorders, assessments, treatments and the importance of context indisorders. It is intended to be a CREATIVE assignment that allows you to more fullyunderstand psychological disorders. The paper should be a 4-6 pages double-spaced(12 point Times New Roman font, 1 inch margins) paper and citations should be in APA style. NOTE: The paper must be on ONE of the following topics: 75 pointsOption A:Choose any fictional character that you believe may have a psychological disorder(s).Provide a brief summary of the character and the movie, book, show, etc. from whichthe character came. Write about the psychological disorder or disorders you believes/he has and give reasons for your diagnosis. Why does s/he fit the DSM 5 criteria?Give specific examples from the movie, show, or book in order to support your claims.Additionally, explain contextual factors in the development of the disorder and how thedisorder impacts those contextual factors. Why do you think the character developedthese symptoms? Family issues? Lack of support from friends and family? Also, includetreatments you would recommend to alleviate his/her symptoms. Show critical thinkingabout diagnoses and contextual factors in the development of such disorders. Do notuse any of the characters given as examples during class lectures.

Defining Types of Causation | Nursing School Essays

I only need 2 paragraph. No cover sheet. This is not a full paper
Defining Types of Causation
In this week’s reading we learned about four types of causality: causally necessary, causally sufficient, causally necessary and sufficient, and causal dependence of one variable on another.
post two example claims of at least two types of causality and label them appropriately. Then, explain why the example fits your definition/selected type of causality.
In this discussion be sure that you are explaining the position you take with regard to the examples you choose.  For example, if A is a necessary condition of B, then be sure to explain why this is the case.  This may also require you to look at counterexamples to your examples as well.  Also, below is an additional link on Necessary and Sufficient conditions with practice quizzes. 
http://faculty.uncfsu.edu/jyoung/necessary_and_sufficient_conditions.htm

What is their personal approach to conquering day to day tasks?

Spearman proposed general intelligence whereas other psychologists such as Gardner and Sternberg proposed multiple intelligence. Pretending that you are a psychologist, how would you define intelligence?Your answer should be 2 pages, double-spaced. Please respond to 2 others.Student A’s opinion.The word “intelligence” is often associated with the word “smart.” Intelligence and smart are wrongfully associated with each other. The connotation that smart gives off to people is that smart can be applied to learning inferences whereas intelligence is something that cannot be learned but rather the person just innately has it, whatever “it” may be. The general consensus of the definition of intelligence is defined as “the ability to learn from one’s experiences, acquire knowledge, and use resources effectively in adapting to new situations or solving problems” (Ciccarelli 277). Gardner and Sternberg both believed that multiple intelligence is a concrete concept and that there are multiple subcategories under the definition of intelligence. I think that the more you can break up a definition into smaller pieces, much like Gardner has done, the easier it is to analyze and try to understand what intelligence really is.If I were a psychologist, I would lean more towards Sternberg’s theory of multiple intelligence. I would define intelligence as one’s ability to learn and then apply it to the situation and communicate with others in any situation the individual is placed in. When I was in high school, my math teacher gave me a lot of advice about what students are like and how teachers are. I wanted to be a teacher and we always talked about the intelligence teachers and students hold. The biggest thing I took away from all of our talks was that someone can be incredibly smart and effortlessly understands everything but cannot explain themselves to anyone. She warned me that in college, I’ll run into math professors who are frighteningly smart, but cannot clearly explain the lesson they are teaching because of the lack of social intelligence they have. I realized that when I had a calculus class and although the teacher clearly knew what he was speaking about, he did not know how to communicate with any of his students and then half of the class dropped out because they could not learn from him. Intelligence is not just your level of comprehension, but your level of awareness socially and analytically.If I was to analyze a person’s level of intelligence, I would look at the way they are living their day to day life. Do they have solid relationships with family and friends? Can they communicate openly with others? If I were to go to them with a problem, would this person be able to take it apart and help me understand what needs to be done to fix the problem? What is their personal approach to conquering day to day tasks? I do not think of intelligence as a number, like one’s GPA or IQ scores. I’m the worst test taker, I can completely understand a concept but then I blank out during the test. I know that I’m an intelligent human being because I know that there are other ways of measuring one’s intelligence other than a number.Gardner’s musical type of intelligence specifically stood out to me because in the chart, under sample occupation, it read “Musicians, even those who do not read musical notes but can perform and compose”(Ciccarelli 278). My mom is an ESL teacher, but before that, she taught Special Ed. She had a student who was severely autistic but could listen to a song and then play it back perfectly on the piano. She never had taken a piano lesson and could not read piano notes, but after hearing a song only once, she was able to find the right keys and play it. In terms of intelligence, her musical intelligence I’m sure was on the higher end of Gardner’s scale. I like the idea that figuring out one’s intelligence can be figured out in so many ways, because it shows that there is more to a person other than their analyzing or book smarts. Different types of intelligence not only allow psychologists to understand their subject but it gives credit to what the person is capable of.Student B’s opinion.In this chapter, intelligence is defined as the ability to learn from one’s experiences, acquire knowledge, and use resources effectively in adapting to new situations or solving problems. Some psychologists argue that people may be intelligent in a specific area but to me, intelligence is when a person can apply knowledge of every aspect into their daily life.In my opinion, for someone to be intelligent they would have to be able to utilize all skills learned that Sternberg mentioned; Analytical, Creative and Practical intelligence. If someone had a 4.0 GPA in college but weren’t able to get by in everyday life without issues, are they really that smart? There may be different levels of intelligence which can be tested usually in an IQ test but I believe that if a person is able to use all three then they are intelligent.If people succeed in certain things, I think they are considered gifted in that area not necessarily intelligent. One may be able to play an instrument but can’t read or they can be good writers but not be able to socialize in different environments. Intelligence is using all the tools you’ve been given and achieving the task at hand. Being able to comprehend information, use good judgment in choices and have a good sense of their surroundings.I’m not saying that if a person who is street smart but not books smart is stupid. I’m just saying that if a person can do it all, I consider them intelligent. Some people are not good test takers but know the material. Some can play music but are not able to read music and some may be a genius knowing math but socially awkward. Intelligence is based on how you use everything you’ve learned throughout the years in your daily life. Everyone shines in their own way and are good at certain things in life.

Define professional boundaries, boundary crossings, and boundary violations. What effects do boundaries have on the therapeutic relationship?

1. What are at least two legal issues associated with clinical psychology? Provide an example of
a situation that could be legal but unethical. Explain your response.
2. What are at least two ethical issues associated with clinical psychology? Provide an example
of a situation that could be ethical but illegal. Explain your response.
3. Define professional boundaries, boundary crossings, and boundary violations. What effects
do boundaries have on the therapeutic relationship?
4. What are at least two cultural limitations associated with assessment and treatment? In your
response, discuss the use or misuse of assessment instruments, therapy techniques,
research results, or any other facet of clinical practice that could have potentially harmful,
culture-specific implications.

create a chart that illustrates preventative care measures for individuals ranging from age 21-65.

Paper , Order, or Assignment Requirements The following website will aid you in completing this Assignment: Utilizing the US Preventive Services Task force site (http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Name/recommendations) Directions You will need to create a chart that illustrates preventative care measures for individuals ranging from age 21-65. The chart should include:
● Immunization recommendations
● Well person visit recommendations
● Cancer screening recommendations (cervical, breast, prostate, colon)
● Other preventative services (dental care, vision care, screening for age related memory changes, etc)

 

1. All work teams are work groups, but not all work groups are work teams. Do you agree or…

1. All work teams are work groups, but not all work groups are work teams. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Discuss.
2. Would you prefer to work alone or as part of a team? Why? Support your response with data from your self-assessments.
3. Describe a situation in which individuals, acting independently, outperform teams in an organization.
 

What term is used to describe the benign condition that may have caused Ms. Barker’s breast mass?

Joan Barker, age fifty-six years, comes for a routine physical examination. She states that she has been in perfect health and has no complaints. She has a history of asthma but currently requires no medications of any kind. Her physical examination is completely normal, except for a 2-cm firm, nontender, nonmobile mass in the upper outer quadrant of her left breast. She indicates that she does not perform regular breast self-examination and that she did not know the mass was there. She has no family history of breast cancer and has never been pregnant.
Answer the following questions about Ms. Barker’s condition:
What term is used to describe the benign condition that may have caused Ms. Barker’s breast mass?
What is inside the cysts of fibrocystic breast disease?
Mammography and ultrasonography reveal a solid lesion (not cystic). What is the most common type of breast cancer?
Biopsy determines that Ms. Barker has invasive carcinoma of the breast. What is the difference between ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma of the breast?
Barker’s breast cancer has metastasized to her lungs. What is the difference between metastatic lung cancer and primary lung cancer?