Tag Archive for: nursing

nursing autobiography

I will do the nursing autobiography, just need the rest:

Concept Synthesis Paper on Personal Nursing Philosophy

Your Concept Synthesis Paper is due this week. By the due date assigned, submit your scholarly paper, in which you have identified, described, researched and applied the concepts that underlie your personal philosophy for professional nursing practice.

Collate the work that you have done so far from Weeks 1–3, and submit your paper in the prescribed format to the Submissions Area.

Your paper should include:

  • Nursing Autobiography: A brief (1 page) discussion of your background in nursing.
  • The Four Metaparadigms: Identification, discussion, and documentation from the literature of your perspective on the four metaparadigms of patient, nurse, health, and environment.
  • Two Practice-Specific Concepts: Identification, discussion, and documentation from the literature of your perspective on at least two concepts specific to your own practice.
  • List of Propositions: A numbered list of at least five propositions or assumption statements that clearly connect the concepts described.

Your paper should integrate these discrete elements and reflect your personal nursing philosophy.

The paper should be thoroughly researched and well documented, with relevant material from the nursing theorists presented incorporated into the paper. (Please use Virginia Henderson’s Nursing Theory) The current APA Manual is to be used throughout the paper. Sources should focus on references from nursing theory but may also include conceptual and theoretical material from other professional domains. The paper, excluding references or appendices, is to be limited to 4-6 pages. Writing should be succinct and well organized, as it is impossible for the facilitator to evaluate form and content separately.

Your philosophy/framework is to be given a title that is appropriate to its content and emphasis.

Download the Concept Synthesis Template.

Rubric:

Rubric Name: NSG5002 Week 3 Project Rubric

The nursing autobiography included personal experiences in the field of nursing. Provided an account of the current professional role of the student and included factors that guided decision making.

Quality of Essay Two Concepts

The essay enlisted two practice-specific concepts with definitions and citations.

Quality of Essay Propositions/Assumptions

The essay included a numbered list of at least 5 propositions or assumptions. The assumptions illustrated the concepts in a manner, which further clarified the students’ use of the conceptual material. The essay demonstrated consistency between concepts and assumptions. The concepts were connected and integrated to reveal a meaningful sequence. The essay demonstrated clarification and organization of the students’ professional foundation. The essay demonstrated evidence of critical thinking in analysis and response. The essay demonstrated understanding and integration of lecture material, reading assignments, and sources consulted.

Presentation Criteria/Clinical Example

The paper clearly demonstrated understanding of theoretical principles (i.e., concept development, definitions, etc.). The paper revealed clarity, organization, and articulation of ideas. The paper showed that ideas were well documented. The paper revealed an excellent breadth of research effort. Excellent clinical example written that shows student incorporation of their two concepts in their nursing practice.

Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.

The writer’s overall argument and language are clear and focused, leaving the reader with no confusion about author’s intent; the text is basically error free.

Used APA formatted citations and references, and used correct structural formatting.

Using Academic/APA format proficiently; text is basically error free.

possible Hepatitis C. HL

This week, we’re discussing gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders. Below is the case for this week’s assignment along with the directions for the assignment.

Patient HL comes into the clinic with the following symptoms: nausea, vomiting, and

diarrhea. The patient has a history of drug abuse and possible Hepatitis C. HL is

currently taking the following prescription drugs:

  • Synthroid 100 mcg daily
  • Nifedipine 30 mg daily
  • Prednisone 10 mg daily

Write a 1-page paper that addresses the following:

  • Explain your diagnosis for the patient, including your rationale for the diagnosis.
  • Describe an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.
  • Justify why you would recommend this drug therapy plan for this patient. Be specific and provide examples.
  • APA citation 3 to 5 References within 5 years

clinically oriented problem

Details:

In this assignment, students will pull together the change proposal project components they have been working on throughout the course to create a proposal inclusive of sections for each content focus area in the course. At the conclusion of this project, the student will be able to apply evidence-based research steps and processes required as the foundation to address a clinically oriented problem or issue in future practice.

Students will develop a 1,250-1,500 word paper that includes the following information as it applies to the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need profiled in the capstone change proposal:

  1. Background
  2. Problem statement
  3. Purpose of the change proposal
  4. PICOT
  5. Literature search strategy employed
  6. Evaluation of the literature
  7. Applicable change or nursing theory utilized
  8. Proposed implementation plan with outcome measures
  9. Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome
  10. Appendix section, if tables, graphs, surveys, educational materials, etc. are created

Review the feedback from your instructor on the Topic 3 assignment, PICOT Statement Paper, and Topic 6 assignment, Literature Review. Use the feedback to make appropriate revisions to the portfolio components before submitting.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

suicide

eflect on the analysis of the sin of suicide and, thus, euthanasia from the topic readings. Do you agree? Why or why not? Refer to the lecture and topic readings in your response

organization’s leadership team

Develop a 3- to 4-page paper, written to your organization’s leadership team, addressing your selected national healthcare issue/stressor and how it is impacting your work setting. Be sure to address the following:

  • Describe the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected and its impact on your organization. Use organizational data to quantify the impact (if necessary, seek assistance from leadership or appropriate stakeholders in your organization).
  • Provide a brief summary of the two articles you reviewed from outside resources on the national healthcare issue/stressor. Explain how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.
  • Summarize the strategies used to address the organizational impact of national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the scholarly resources you selected. Explain how they may impact your organization both positively and negatively. Be specific and provide examples.

Visual Art

Humanities Test-Out 02 – Visual Art

Competency
Develop a vocabulary for criticizing, evaluating, and describing works of art.

For this assessment task, you are asked to act as an art critic and analyze a series of works. When art critics discuss art, they describe art works in terms of style and medium. Art critics interpret meanings of art and make judgements of a work’s validity to the importance of a piece in the larger context of art history and culture. Art critics also evaluate art in the context of aesthetics.

Please watch the presentation below as a refresher on this deliverable’s content. The presentation will not tell you everything you need to know to pass this test-out, but it should serve as a refresher.

Assessment 2 PPT

 

Competency

Develop a vocabulary for criticizing, evaluating, and describing works of art.

Instructions

For this competency, you will assume the role of a critic. View each piece of work listed below and analyze it as a piece of art, identifying key elements of the work and using terminology common to the discipline. Using a few concise paragraphs for each piece, your analysis should discuss each work as a critic would and include, using the proper vocabulary, what you think the work is about.

Grading Rubric (for each response)

0

1

2

3

4

Category

Not Submitted

No pass

Competence

Proficiency

Mastery

Elements

Not Submitted

Does not identify key elements of the piece of art

Identifies the key elements of that piece of art.

Identifies the key elements of that piece of art and explains them.

Identifies the key elements of that piece of art and explains them, referencing other works of art.

Vocabulary

Not Submitted

Does not use the vocabulary common to that field of art.

Uses the common vocabulary of that field of art.

Uses the common vocabulary of that field of art with explanation.

Uses the common vocabulary of that field of art with a detailed explanation.

Subject/Movement

Not Submitted

Does not offer an explanation as to what the piece is about or the movement the piece represents.

Explains what the piece is about or the movement the piece represents.

Explains what the piece is about or the movement the piece represents in detail.

Explains what the piece is about or the movement the piece represents in detail, referencing other works of art.

Coverage

No pieces discussed.

Pieces discussed, but not enough detail provided.

Pieces discussed, and details provided.

Pieces thoroughly discussed, and insightful details provided.

Pieces thoroughly discussed, and insightful details provided, making reference to additional works.

C:\Users\jlaux\Desktop\Manet.jpg

C:\Users\jlaux\Desktop\Judith.jpg

C:\Users\jlaux\Desktop\Pieta.jpg

http://www.getty.edu/museum/media/images/web/thumbnail/13373701.jpg

C:\Users\jlaux\Desktop\Picasso.jpg

http://www.getty.edu/museum/media/images/web/enlarge/10932501.jpg

Healing and Autonomy

Write a 1,200-1,500 word analysis of “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy.” In light of the readings, be sure to address the following questions:

  1. Under the Christian narrative and Christian vision, what sorts of issues are most pressing in this case study?
  2. Should the physician allow Mike to continue making decisions that seem to him to be irrational and harmful to James?
  3. According to the Christian narrative and the discussion of the issues of treatment refusal, patient autonomy, and organ donation in the topic readings, how might one analyze this case?
  4. According to the topic readings and lecture, how ought the Christian think about sickness and health? What should Mike as a Christian do? How should he reason about trusting God and treating James?

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

RUBRIC:

Identification of Ethical Issues and Christian Principles and Values

Ethical issues along with Christian principles and values pertaining to the case study are identified. Any apparent tensions between religious autonomy and physician recommendation are acknowledged.

Analysis of Ethical Issues and Christian Principles and Values

The analysis of the application of the Christian Worldview principles regarding the ethical issues is excellent in reaching a viable conclusion. An accurate biblical perspective with detailed interaction with the biblical text regarding medicine is clearly discussed, along with how it relates to the issue of healing.

Thesis Development and Purpose

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Argument Logic and Construction

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

All format elements are correct

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage

health needs

Write an opinion on the health needs of an elderly Cambodian refugee who came to the United States 28 years ago.         a.  Include cultural and political trends and related challenges that differ from other immigrants.          b.  What health implications emerge from the pressure of being a refugee?

 

· Present your assignment in a word document.

· APA 6th edition format. Format Arial 12 font.

· Attached is the power point and book information.

· Minimum 3 evidence-based references are required.

· Minimum 700 words are required.

· Must be free of plagiarism…check in Turnitin .

 SWOT Analysis of a Two Person Family Practice

SWOT Analysis of a Two Person Family Practice

This is a follow-up to the previous assignment posted here https://www.homeworkmarket.com/questions/competency-assessment

The project must needs to be personalized as if you are actively the Person in the Family Practice.

Assume you are a two-person Family Practice office who is contemplating upgrading their current basic electronic health record to a new vendor in order to meet the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services goal of improving interoperability and patients’ access to health information (formerly known as meaningful use).

For your assigned components, conduct a SWOT analysis for the practice as the practice considers this initiative. Your identified components should be explicit and include an explanation as to why it is a strength, weakness, threat or opportunity. Your paper should be in APA format.

A SWOT analysis includes an organization’s self- assessment of their strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats in their environment as they consider a new goal.

  • Strengths are those internal factors that are favorable to achieving the goal.

Easy communication, reliability, skilled professionals, time management skills, well detailed documentation, critical thinking ability, cost advantage, special expertise.

  • Weaknesses are internal factors that interfere with achieving the goal.

Limited service, marketing deficiency, inadequate manpower, limited resources, lagging in technology,

  • Opportunities are external factors that may help the organization attain its goal.

New technology, new market, competitor vulnerabilities,

  • Threats are external factors that may hinder the organization’s attainment of its goal.

Increased competition, insurance plan changes, government policies, demographic changes, seasonality, changes in reimbursement.

questionnaire

For this assignment, use a minimum of three scholarly references and it should be approximately three to four pages long, not counting the cover page or references list. APA style. Free of plagiarism.

Include the following:

Application: Of the six dimensions in the questionnaire (trait, ability, skill, behavior, relationship, and process).

Which one is the most similar to your own perspective? Which one is least like your own perspective? develop about this topic.

Note: The six dimensions in the questionary are already explained, please only refer and develop to the one that is most similar to mine perspective (skill), and my least likely perspective (process).

questionnaire

Attached, you will find a pic of the “1.2 Conceptualizing Leadership Questionnaire”.

1.3 Observational Exercise.

Attached, you will find the pics with the instructions and questions that need to be answered.

Assignment is half way done, also attached you will find the pictures needed to complete this assignment.