Tag Archive for: nursing

Bronchorrhea

/in /by

Using the ICD-10-PCS index in Encoder Pro, look up Sarcoid. What does the entry show?

 

a.Does not say anything

b.(Type D)

c.  Q79.2

d.  (See also Sarcoidosis)

Questions 2  

Using the ICD-10-PCS index in Encoder Pro, look up Bronchorrhea. What does the entry show?

Use J98.09

See condition

See Pneumonia, broncho

Does not say anything

QUESTION 3 

Using the ICD-10-PCS index in Encoder Pro, look up Whipple’s disease. What does the entry show?

Use K90.81

(see also subcategory M14.8-)

Does not say anything

(See also condition)

QUESTION 4 

In Encoder Pro in the ICD-10-PCS index under the word virus, the coder is told to “see also condition.” This means the coder should:

look up the word condition.

check the documentation for more complete diagnostic information.

choose a code from those listed under virus, viral.

do nothing.

QUESTION 5

Using Encoder Pro, look in the Tabular section of ICD-10-PCS at code I63. There is an includes note, an excludes note 1, and another note, which states:

add 5th and 6th digits.

use additional code, if applicable, to identify status post administration of tPA.

use additional code, if applicable, to identify status post administration of tPA (rtPA) in a different facility within the last 24 hours prior to admission to current facility (Z92.82).

Z92.82.

 Place the following in chronological order. QUESTION 6

 

Follow any instructional terms and select the code.

– 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Locate the main term in the alphabetic index.

– 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Scan the main term entry for any instructional notifications and identify any terms that modify the main term.

– 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Follow any cross-reference notes.

– 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Always verify the code in the tabular list.

QUESTION 7

In diagnostic coding, if the condition has occurred, then that will be a confirmed diagnosis. If the condition did not occur, this would mean the condition is impending or suspected. Why is it important to know if the condition is confirmed or suspected?

Your response should be at least 200 words in length.

QUESTION 8

 

When it comes to coding, it is essential to use the index and the tabular list when you are locating the code. When using the index, it does not always show the full code. Based on what you have learned in this unit, why do you feel using the index and the tabular list is important?

Your response should be at least 200 words in length.

— Font family —- Font size —
— Format –HeadingSub Heading 1Sub Heading 2ParagraphFormatted Code

"Is this question part of your assignment? We can help"

ORDER NOW

 FierceHealthIT

/in /by

Students will login to FierceEMR and FierceHealthIT using the link provided in the reading assignment module for Week 5 and select a “current/popular” topic of the week that may impact their practice. Students, in a professionally developed paper, will discuss the rationale for choosing the topic, how it will impact practice in a positive or negative manner, citing pros and cons. Include a discussion of how informatics skills and knowledge were used in the process relevance to developing the assignment. In the conclusion, provide recommendations for the future. Submit completed FierceHealthIT

https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/privacy-security/decatur-county-general-hospital-ehr-data-breach

See attachment for complete instructions of what to do.

4 to 6 pages

"Is this question part of your assignment? We can help"

ORDER NOW

The Pathophysiology of Disorders

/in /by

APA format 6 peer review references 3 from Walden Library.  Please pick the topic Congestive Heart Failure or COPD from below list and follow instructions

 

Assignment: Application: The Pathophysiology of Disorders

In previous weeks, you explored various body systems: cardiovascular, respiratory, nervous, endocrine, musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, and hematological. These seven systems work together, along with other body systems, to complete a myriad of functions. For this reason, when disorders occur within one body system, they can create potentially devastating effects throughout the entire body. For instance, Parkinson’s disease is a disorder of the central nervous system, yet its alterations actually affect multiple body systems, from the cardiovascular system to the gastrointestinal system. In this Assignment, you examine alterations associated with disorders, as well as the impact of the alterations on multiple body systems.

To prepare:

  • From the list below, select a disorder of interest to you:
    • Alzheimer’s disease
    • Asthma in children
    • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
    • Congestive heart failure
    • Hepatic disease (liver disease)
    • Hypertension
    • Hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism
    • Seizures
    • Sepsis
  • Reflect on alterations associated with the disorder you selected. Consider the pathophysiology of the alterations. Think about how these alterations produce pathophysiological changes in at least two body systems.
  • Think about the types of drugs that would be used to treat alterations associated with the disorder you selected.
  • Reflect on how patient factors, such as genetics, gender, ethnicity, age, and behavior might impact the pathophysiology of the alterations you identified. Then, consider how these factors might impact the effects of prescribed drugs, as well as measures you might take to help reduce any negative side effects.
  • Locate an agency that provides patient education on your selected disorder and review the available materials and curriculum. Consider how you might be able to use those materials to educate a patient on the disorder, treatment options, management, and self-care.
By Day 7

Develop a 5- to 10-slide PowerPoint Presentation that addresses the following:;

  • Describe the disorder you selected, as well as associated alterations. Explain the pathophysiology of the alterations, including changes that occur in at least two body systems.
  • Describe the types of drugs that would be prescribed to treat alterations associated with the disorder.
  • Explain how genetics, gender, ethnicity, age, and behavior might impact the pathophysiology of the alterations you identified and the effects of prescribed drugs.  Then, describe measures you might take to help reduce any negative side effects.
  • Explain how you would use materials from a supporting agency to educate patients on the disorder, treatment options, management, and self-care.

This assignment is due.

"Is this question part of your assignment? We can help"

ORDER NOW

common practice” and “best practice”

/in /by

Is there a difference between “common practice” and “best practice”?

When you first went to work for your current organization, experienced colleagues may have shared with you details about processes and procedures. Perhaps you even attended an orientation session to brief you on these matters. As a “rookie,” you likely kept the nature of your questions to those with answers that would best help you perform your new role.

Over time and with experience, perhaps you recognized aspects of these processes and procedures that you wanted to question further. This is the realm of clinical inquiry.

Clinical inquiry is the practice of asking questions about clinical practice. To continuously improve patient care, all nurses should consistently use clinical inquiry to question why they are doing something the way they are doing it. Do they know why it is done this way, or is it just because we have always done it this way? Is it a common practice or a best practice?

In this Assignment, you will identify clinical areas of interest and inquiry and practice searching for research in support of maintaining or changing these practices. You will also analyze this research to compare research methodologies employed.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.
  • Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest.
  • Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.
  • Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.

Part 1: An Introduction to Clinical Inquiry

Create a 4- to 5-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

  • Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.
  • Describe how you used keywords to search on your chosen clinical issue of interest.
  • Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.
  • Provide APA citations of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected.

Part 2: Identifying Research Methodologies

After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:

  • The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.
  • A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.
  • A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.
  • A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.
  • A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

"Is this question part of your assignment? We can help"

ORDER NOW

disseminate the results of your project to an audience

/in /by

Create a 5-minute, 5- to 6-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation of your Evidence-Based Project.

Be sure to incorporate any feedback or changes from your presentation submission in Module 5.

Explain how you would disseminate the results of your project to an audience. Provide a rationale for why you selected this dissemination strategy

"Is this question part of your assignment? We can help"

ORDER NOW

nursing as a career,

/in /by

. Describe what drew you to pursue nursing as a career, and how you see yourself contributing to the nursing profession over the next 5-10 years. (approximately 200 words)
2. Describe how your values align with the mission of Creighton University. (approximately 200 words)
3. Describe an uncomfortable situation or ethical dilemma you encountered. What was your response in the situation, and what (if anything) would you do differently and why? (approximately 200 words)
4. The 12-month Accelerated BSN is an academically rigorous program during which much of a student’s time is occupied with school obligations. Describe the strategies you plan to use to successfully complete this challenging program given the competing demands on your time. (approximately 200 words)
5. If applicable, provide a rationale for any of the following discrepancies on your transcripts. Part of this rationale should provide an explanation of what has changed to promote success in this program.

  • Grades that are lower than a C
  • Courses with a W (withdrawals)
  • Semesters in which you were not a full-time student
  • Other considerations (extended leaves, previous enrollment in professional programs, misconducts, dismissals)

"Is this question part of your assignment? We can help"

ORDER NOW

Materials and the work

/in /by

View Rubric   Due Date:   Feb 22

Details:
Review the Topic Materials and the work completed in NRS-433V to   formulate a PICOT statement for your capstone project.

A PICOT starts with a designated patient population in a particular   clinical area and identifies clinical problems or issues that arise   from clinical care. The intervention should be an independent,   specified nursing change intervention. The intervention cannot require   a provider prescription. Include a comparison to a patient population   not currently receiving the intervention, and specify the timeframe   needed to implement the change process.

Formulate a PICOT statement using the PICOT format provided in the   assigned readings. The PICOT statement will provide a framework for   your capstone project.

In a paper of 500-750 words, clearly identify the clinical problem   and how it can result in a positive patient outcome.

Make sure to address the following on the PICOT statement:

  1. Evidence-Based Solution
  2. Nursing Intervention
  3. Patient Care
  4. Health Care Agency
  5. Nursing   Practice

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA   Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to   beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for   successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer   to the directions in the Student Success Center.

 

Apply Rubrics

PICOT Statement Paper
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%                                                     2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%                                                     3
Satisfactory
79.00%                                                     4
Good
89.00%                                                     5
Excellent
100.00%                            80.0 %Content     30.0 % Identification of Clinical Problem/Issue                                                   Clinical problem/issue is not identified, and resolution is not addressed.                                                  Clinical problem/issue is identified with little discussion of resolution or patient outcome.                                                  Clinical problem/issue is identified but not  supported with clinical observations or evidence. The identified  problem/issue can be resolved, or a patient outcome shows minimal  improvement.                                                  Clinical problem/issue is identified based  on clinical observation experience or evidence in literature. Articles  are cited to support the need for change in nursing practice. The  identified problem/issue can be resolved, or a patient outcome can be  improved using nursing interventions.                                                  Clinical problem/issue is identified based  on key concepts that define evidence-based practice or clinical  experience. Articles are cited to support the need for change in nursing  practice. The identified problem/issue can be resolved, or a patient  outcome can show a marked improvement through a nursing intervention.   30.0 % Clinical  Problem/Issue, Including Description, Evidence-Based Solution, Nursing  Intervention, Patient Care, Health Care Agency, and Nursing Practice                                                   Clinical problem/issue is not described with  clarity and the corresponding elements are not included.                                                  Clinical problem/issue description includes a  basic understanding of the problem/issue and setting, with few of the  following elements explained: evidence-based solution, nursing  intervention, patient care, health care agency, and nursing practice.                                                  Clinical problem/issue description includes a  basic understanding of the problem/issue, the setting, and the patient  population. The following elements are explained: evidence-based  solution, nursing intervention, patient care, health care agency, and  nursing practice. Minimal rationale is provided to support the  resolution of the clinical problem/issue.                                                  Clinical problem/issue description includes a  thorough understanding of the problem/issue, the setting, the patient  population, and why it is a problem/issue. The following elements are  explained in detail: evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, and  patient care consistent with specific health care agency and nursing  practice. Sound rationale is provided supporting the clinical  problem/issue resolution.                                                  Clinical problem/issue description includes a  developed and thorough explanation of the problem/issue, the setting,  the patient population, and the rationale for why it is a problem/issue.  The identified clinical problem/issue explains the following elements  with detail and clarity: evidence-based solution, nursing intervention,  and improved patient care consistent with specific health care agency  resulting in nursing practice change. Sound rationale is provided in the  discussion of the clinical problem/issue resolution.   10.0 % PICOT Statement Focused on Resolution, Improvement, Application, and Intervention                                                   PICOT statement does not focus on resolution  of a problem/issue, improvement of patient care or application of a  nursing intervention.                                                  PICOT statement discusses a clinical problem/issue without a focus on improvement or intervention.                                                  PICOT statement focuses on the resolution of  a clinical problem/issue that improves patient care through the  application of a nursing intervention.                                                  PICOT statement focuses on the resolution of  a clinical problem/issue, with discussion of improving patient care  through the application of an evidenced-based nursing intervention.                                                  PICOT statement clearly focuses on the  resolution of a clinical problem/issue and aims at improving patient  care through the application of an evidenced-based nursing intervention.   10.0 % PICOT Statement Including Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Time                                                   Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Time are not included.                                                  Population, Intervention, Comparison,  Outcomes, and Time are present, but lack detail or are incomplete.                                                  Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Time are present.                                                  Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Time are clearly provided and well developed.                                                  Population, Intervention, Comparison,  Outcomes, and Time are comprehensive and thoroughly developed with  supporting details.   15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness     5.0 % Presentation                                                   Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.                                                  Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.                                                  Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.                                                  Thesis is clear and forecasts the  development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the  arguments and appropriate to the purpose.                                                  Thesis is comprehensive and contains the  essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper  clear.   5.0 % Argument Logic and Construction                                                   Statement of purpose is not justified by the  conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is  incoherent and uses noncredible sources.                                                  Sufficient justification of claims is  lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the  logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.                                                  Argument is orderly, but may have a few  inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims.  Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources  used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.                                                   Argument shows logical progressions.  Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression  of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are  authoritative.                                                  Clear and convincing argument that presents a  persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources  are authoritative.   5.0 % Mechanics of Writing  (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)                                                   Surface errors are pervasive enough that  they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or  sentence construction is used.                                                  Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors  distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register),  sentence structure, or word choice are present.                                                  Some mechanical errors or typos are present,  but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence  structure and audience-appropriate language are used.                                                   Prose is largely free of mechanical errors,  although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and  effective figures of speech are used.                                                   Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.   5.0 %Format      2.0 % Paper Format  (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)                                                   Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.                                                  Template is used, but some elements are  missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.                                                  Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.                                                   Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.                                                  All format elements are correct.    5.0 %Format      3.0 % Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)                                                   Sources are not documented.                                                  Documentation of sources is inconsistent or  incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous  formatting errors.                                                  Sources are documented, as appropriate to  assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.                                                  Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.                                                   Sources are completely and correctly  documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free  of error.     100 % Total Weightage

"Is this question part of your assignment? We can help"

ORDER NOW

green computing

/in /by

1)  Many believe that cloud computing can reduce the total cost of computing and enhance “green computing” (environmental friendly). Why do you believe this to be correct? If you disagree, please explain why?

2)  According to recent surveys, China, India, and the Philippines are the three most popular countries for IT outsourcing. Write a short paper (2-4 paragraphs) explaining what the appeal would be for US companies to outsource IT functions to these countries. You may discuss cost, labor pool, language, or possibly government support as your reasons. There are many other reasons you may choose to highlight in your paper. Be sure to use your own words.

3)  IEEE802.1x

"Is this question part of your assignment? We can help"

ORDER NOW

Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations 

/in /by

Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations

Write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of two quantitative research studies. Use the “Research Critique Guidelines – Part II” document to organize your essay. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide a rationale, include examples, and reference content from the study in your responses.

Use the practice problem and two quantitative, peer‐reviewed research articles you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment.

In a 1,000–1,250 word essay, summarize two quantitative studies, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

AttachmentsNRS-433V-RS3-ResearchCritiqueGuidelinesPart II.docx
RUBRIC

Attempt Start Date: 27-May-2019 at 12:00:00 AM

Due Date: 02-Jun-2019 at 11:59:59 PM

Maximum Points: 200.0

Rough Draft Research Critique – Quantitative

No of Criteria: 11 Achievement Levels: 5CriteriaAchievement LevelsDescriptionPercentage1: Unsatisfactory0.00 %2: Less Than Satisfactory75.00 %3: Satisfactory83.00 %4: Good94.00 %5: Excellent100.00 %Content75.0     Quantitative Studies5.0Only one article is presented. Neither of the articles presented use quantitative research.Two articles are presented. Of the articles presented, only one article is based on quantitative research.N/AN/ATwo articles are presented. Both articles are based on quantitative research.Background of Study10.0Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete.Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.Article Support of Nursing Practice15.0Discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is incomplete.A summary of how articles support the PICOT question is presented. It is unclear how the articles can be used to answer the proposed PICOT question. Significant information and detail is required.A general discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate general support in answering the proposed PICOT question. It is unclear how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Some rational or information is needed.A discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Minor detail or rational is needed for clarity or support.A clear discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate strong support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles strongly compare to those identified in the PICOT question.Method of Study15.0Discussion on the method of study for each article is omitted. The comparison of study methods is omitted or incomplete.A partial summary of the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is incomplete. A benefit and a limitation of each method are omitted or incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.A general discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is summarized. A benefit and a limitation of each method are summarized. There some inaccuracies or partial omissions. More information is needed.A discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is generally described. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. There minor are inaccuracies. Some detail is required for accuracy or clarity.A thorough discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is described in detail. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. The discussion demonstrates a solid understanding of research methods.Results of Study15.0Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is incomplete.A summary of the study results includes findings and implications for nursing practice but lacks relevant details and explanation. There are some omissions or inaccuracies.Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is generally presented. Overall, the discussion includes some relevant details and explanation.Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.Anticipated Outcomes and Outcomes Comparison15.0Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are omitted or are unrealistic. Comparison of research article outcomes to anticipated outcomes is incomplete.Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are partially summarized. Comparison of research article outcomes to anticipated outcomes contains omissions of key information. It is unclear how the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT and those of the current research mentioned compare.Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are summarized. Comparison of research article outcomes to anticipated outcomes is generally presented. More information is needed to fully establish how the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT and those of the current research mentioned compare.Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are discussed. A comparison of research article outcomes to anticipated outcomes of the PICOT is presented. An explanation of how the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT and those of the current research mentioned compare is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity.Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are thoroughly discussed. A detailed comparison of research article outcomes to the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT is presented. An explanation of how the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT and those of the current research mentioned compare is presented in detail.Organization and Effectiveness15.0     Thesis Development and Purpose5.0Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.Argument Logic and Construction5.0Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)5.0Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.Format10.0     Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)5.0Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct.Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)5.0Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.Total Percentage  100

"Is this question part of your assignment? We can help"

ORDER NOW

Develop a Change in Policy to Improve the Public’s Health

/in /by

Using a Health Policy Model to Develop a Change in Policy to Improve the Public’s Health

This assignment focuses on the methods to develop a change in policy to improve the public’s health by using a health policy model.

Tasks:

Suppose you want to initiate a policy of taxing sugared sodas/pop/beverages in your community. Use the Longest’s policy cycle model to ponder the following questions:

  • What arguments would you use to make the case for the policy?
  • What argument(s) would your opponents make?
  • How would you go about getting buy-in for your proposed policy?
  • What stakeholder groups need to be involved in promoting your policy?

Submission Details:

  • Submit your response in a 2-page Microsoft Word document (500 words).
  • Name your document SU_NSG4068_W1_Project_LastName_FirstInitial.doc.
  • Submit your document to the Submissions Area by the due date assigned.
  • Cite sources in the APA format on a separate page.

Attachments

 

"Is this question part of your assignment? We can help"

ORDER NOW