Eriksons theory is one of the most popular theories to explain psychosocial development. His theory consists of eight stages, and each is characterized by a psychosocial crisis. Generativity versus stagnation is the seventh stage, experienced by adults between the ages of 40 and 65. To better understand this concept of generativity, Warburton, McLaughlin, and Pinsker (2006) conducted a qualitative study with older Australians. In this Discussion, you analyze and apply the findings of the Warburton et al. study.
To prepare: Review the following article from the Learning Resources: Warburton, J., McLaughlin, D., & Pinsker, D. (2006). Generative acts: Family and community involvement of older Australians. The International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 63(2), 115137. doi:10.2190/9TE3-T1G1-333V-3DT8 By Day 3 Post: Summarize Eriksons description of generativity in 23 sentences. Analyze how the findings from Warburton et al. (2006) are consistent or not consistent with Eriksons definition of generativity. Imagine that you are a researcher on the Warburton et al. research team, and then formulate two additional interview questions that align with Eriksons theory about generativity versus stagnation. Identify two specific recommendations for social work interventions or social work service delivery that align with the findings of the study and Eriksons theory about generativity versus stagnation. Explain how the two social work recommendations are aligned with the studys findings and Eriksons theory.

 

Respond in 1000 words with some scholarly references. Use citations, cite your references.
Please read attachment.
What did you find most interesting or “surprising” about  chapter 4?The post Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications, Ch. 4 first appeared on Nursing School Essays.

The difference between performance management and performance appraisal .What HRM is (and is not) • Why both are important, and their purpose • Performance appraisal methods & when or how to use them • Common appraisal error, why these occur and how to avoid them • The difference between formative and summative appraisal • How to identify and deal with performance deficiencies , and recognise good performance • What is involve din performance counselling and when to use this • Using disciplinary measures appropriately • Dismissal and its legal consequences and requirements How motivation theories and performance management are interconnected

Copy this link and paste in your browser following the example giving at the end develop a similar assignment with sound scholar evidence. Laureate Education (2016c). Case study: A Puerto Rican woman with comorbid addiction [Interactive media file]. Baltimore, MD: Author See Assignment Example at the end Note: This case study will serve as the foundation for this Assignment. Examine Case Study: A Puerto Rican Woman With Comorbid Addiction. You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the medication to prescribe to this client. Be sure to consider factors that might impact the clients pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes. At each decision point stop to complete the following:
Decision #1 Which decision did you select? Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources. What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources. Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #1 and the results of the decision. Why were they different?
Decision #2 Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources. What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources. Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #2 and the results of the decision. Why were they different?
Decision #3 Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources. What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources. Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #3 and the results of the decision. Why were they different? Note: Support your rationale with a minimum of three academic resources. While you may use the course text to support your rationale, it will not count toward the resource requirement. References should include Readings Stahl, S. M. (2013). Stahls essential psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical applications (4th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Stahl, S. M., & Grady, M. (2012). Stahls illustrated substance use and impulsive disorder New York, NY: Cambridge University Press

 

For this discussion, identify the population and the clinical area of concern that are addressed in the mental health counseling program for which you will propose the program evaluation. The identified population can be general or specific. You may want to identify a specific, underserved group. Examples of populations include the general public, children and adolescents, adults, women, men, veterans, police officers, Hispanic males, Hispanic females, high school students, college students, et cetera.
Once you have identified your population, identify the clinical area of concern that your project will examine. You might select a certain clinical area of concern that is a focus at your practicum or internship site. Examples of clinical areas of concern include, but are not limited to, substance abuse or dependency, depression, anxiety, eating disorders, attention deficit/hyperactivity symptoms or disorders, or PTSD.
Note: You may change the population, clinical area of concern, and the clinical intervention that you address in discussions throughout this course; doing so, however, will require more work on your part, as you will need to go back and research new literature.
In this post, address the following:

What population does your hypothetical program serve? Specify age range, gender, ethnicity, race, and so forth to demonstrate the unique characteristics of the population served.

What is the clinical area of concern (depression, anxiety, PTSD, eating disorders, self-esteem, et cetera) that your program is designed to address?

Integrate, cite, and reference at least one peer-reviewed journal article that describes how your hypothetical population has unique needs in this area of clinical concern. For example, your hypothetical program could be designed to assist female law enforcement officers who have developed PTSD. In this case, you would find at least one article that describes the particular issues that female officers might face in developing or getting treatment for PTSD.