Tag Archive for: nursing

Methodology

Chapter 3 of the DPI Project, entitled “Methodology,” will expand upon the content and concepts presented in the “Strategic Points Final Draft” (Appendix A) document you completed in its final iteration in Topic 2.

General Requirements:  Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

•Locate the “DPI Proposal Template” in the PI Workspace of the DC Network. •Locate the Strategic Points Final Draft assignment completed earlier in this course. •Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center. •This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. •You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.  Directions:  Use the “DPI Proposal Template” and the “Strategic Points Final Draft” document, to develop a draft of (Chapter 3) Methodology that describes the methodology you are utilizing in your DPI Project Proposal. Sections in Chapter 3 include:

1.Introduction

2.Statement of the Problem

3.Clinical Question(s)

4.Project Methodology

5.Project Design

6.Population and Sample Selection

7.Instrumentation

8.Validity

9.Reliability

10.Data Collection Procedures

11.Data Analysis Procedures

12.Ethical Considerations 1

3.Limitations

14.Summary

Evidence-Based Practice Model and Change Model

Assignment:

Evidence-Based Practice Model and Change Model

Create a PowerPoint presentation that addresses each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Use clear headings that allow your professor to know which bullet you are addressing on the slides in your presentation. Support your content with at least three (3) sources using APA citations throughout your presentation. Make sure to cite the sources using the APA writing style for the presentation. Include a slide for your references at the end. Follow best practices for PowerPoint presentations related to text size, color, images, effects, wordiness, and multimedia enhancements. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

Identify an evidence based practice model and change model that has been defined in Chapters 13 and 14 of the textbook (Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, 2015). Describe in detail how you would utilize the practice model and change model to implement an evidence-based practice change in your clinical practice environment, related to your research topic.

  1. Title Slide (1 slide)
  2. Objective Slide (1 slide)
  3. Identify an evidence-based practice model and change model that has been defined in Chapters 13 and 14 of the textbook (Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, 2015). (2-3 slides).
  4. Describe in detail how you would utilize the practice model and change model to implement an evidence-based practice change in your clinical practice environment, related to your research topic. (6-8 slides)
  5. References (1 slide)

Assignment Expectations:

Length: 8-14 slides
Structure: Include a title slide, objective slide, content slides, reference slide in APA format. Title/Objective/Reference slides do not count towards the minimum slide count for this assignment.
References: Use appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. A minimum of three (3) scholarly sources are required for this assignment.
Rubric: This assignment uses a rubric for scoring. Please review it as part of your assignment preparation and again prior to submission to ensure you have addressed its criteria at the highest level.
Format: Save your assignment as a Microsoft PPT document (.pptx) or a PDF document (.pdf)

Health screening

Complete Journaling Activity 8-1 on pg. 259. Answer the 2 questions using the assessment tools found in the chapter and document your findings to be handed in to the instructor at the end of the Community class.

1. In your clinical Journal, describe a situation you have encounter when doing Health screening or health promotion activities.

a) What did you learn from this experience 

b) How will you practice differently based in this experience?

2. In your clinical journal, describe a situation in which you have observed infant or children not receiving the disease prevention or health promotion services that they needed

a) How could or would you like to advocate for this issue when you begin to practice as an RN?

b) What could you do now?

Health Promotion and Risk Reduction

Health Promotion and Risk Reduction

Cultural Diversity and Community Nursing

Environmental Health

Read chapter 4, 13, and 14 of the class textbooks and review the attached PowerPoint presentations. Once done answer the following questions;

Discuss various theories of health promotion, including Pender’s Health Promotion Model, The Health Belief Model, the Transtheoretical Theory and the Theory of Reasoned Action.
List and discuss health behaviors for health promotion and disease prevention.
Apply and discuss the principles of transcultural nursing to community health nursing.
Apply and discuss the basic concepts of critical theory to environmental health nursing problems.
As stated in the syllabus, present your assignment in an APA format word document, Arial 12 font attached to the forum in the discussion tab of the blackboard titled “Week 4 discussion questions,” and the SafeAssign exercise in the assignment tab of the blackboard which is a mandatory requirement. A minimum of 2 evidence-based references (besides the class textbook) are required. References can’t be more than five years old. You must post two replies on different dates to any of your peers sustained with the proper references no older than five years old and make sure the references are quoted properly in your assignment. You can’t post the replies on the same day, and I must see different dates in the replies to verify attendance.

The assignment consists of 4 questions, please make sure you enumerate the questions on your assignment. An essay-style assignment won’t be accepted.

You must quote the references in the assignment; if not, it is considered plagiarism.

A minimum of 800 words is required (excluding the first and reference page). Please make sure

workplace health and safety

Read Chapter 11

1. Why is the subject of workplace health and safety of concern to nurses?

How are these concepts related to patient safety and patient outcomes?

2. What action is suggested when you are faced with an angry or hostile coworker?

3. Why is substance misuse among nurses a serious concern? What is the most appropriate way to handle a suspicion that a coworker may be involved in serious substance misuse?

4. What is the most common physical injury experienced by LPNs and nursing assistants? How can a nurse manager help staff avoid physical injury at work?

5. Describe several examples of sexual harassment in the workplace. Discuss methods of dealing with these instances.

6. Review the policies and procedures on the following safety issues in your current clinical rotation. Compare with other students in the class. What are the similarities and differences? What might this mean in terms of workplace safety?

• Latex allergies

• Needlestick injuries

• Violence

3. Go to the ANA website and explore the sections on workplace and patient safety under the heading “Professional Nursing Practice.”

Which concepts discussed in these sections are particularly important to the beginning RN? Why?

4. Interview one of the staff nurses on your unit. Explore his or her feelings and concerns related to the following topics. Based on the comments, develop strategies to address the concerns.

• Substance abuse among nurses

• Emergency preparation

• Quality of work life within the organization

Evaluation in Programs

Evaluation in Programs

As a leader in the field, it is essential to learn from the successes and challenges that others have encountered. Particularly with the design and evaluation of programs, many expensive and difficult lessons have already been discovered through previous endeavors.
For this Discussion, you review the literature and analyze a program’s evaluation plan. As you do this, consider what can be surmised from this example and the others shared by your colleagues to guide the development of your program’s evaluation plan.
To prepare:

  • Search the literature and select an      article of interest that includes a program evaluation (select one of the two articles in the      attached file section).
  • Consider the following:
    • Was the evaluation plan appropriate       to the design of the program?
    • Identify the goals and objectives of       the evaluation plan.
    • What were the activities related to       this evaluation?
    • Based upon the data, how valid are       the outcomes?

By tomorrow Monday 1/28/19 at 6 pm, write a minimum of 550 words essay in APA format with a minimum of 3 scholarly references that include the level 1 and 2 headers below: 

Post a cohesive scholarly response that addresses the following:

1) Assess the appropriateness of the evaluation plan and share other information or insights as it relates to the evaluation approach (select one of the two articles in the attached file section).

  • Was the evaluation plan appropriate       to the design of the program?
  • Identify the goals and objectives of       the evaluation plan.
  • What were the activities related to       this evaluation?
  • Based upon the data, how valid are       the outcomes?

2) Include a full citation of your selected article.

Required Readings

Moore, H.K., Preussler, J., Denzen, E.M., Payton, T.J., Thao, V., Murphy, E.A. & Harwood, E. (2014). Designing and operationalizing a customized internal evaluation model for cancer treatment support programs, Journal Cancer Education, 29, 463–372 doi10.1007/s13187-014-0644-8

Redwood, D., Provost, E., Lopez, E.D., Skewes, M., Johnson, R., Christensen, C., Sacco, F., & Haverkamp, D. (2016). A process evaluation of the Alaska Native colorectal cancer family outreach program. Health Education & Behavior, 43(1), 35–42 doi: 10.1177/1090198115590781

Robbins, L.B., Pfeiffer, K.A., Weolek, S.M., & Lo, Y. (2014). Process evaluation for a school-based physical intervention for 6th and 7th grade boys: Reach, dose, and fidelity. Evaluation and Program Planning, 42, 21–31 doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.09.002

clinical reasoning errors

I need you to find two clinical reasoning errors from my interventions in part B file and go with the instructions.

Introduction (300 words)

Provide a very brief overview of your clinical encounter that highlights where the error/challenge/missed opportunity occurred (300 words).

Body (700 words)

Upon reviewing the module content and your previous paper, identify TWO clinical reasoning errors that best aligned to, or potentially could have occurred during your encounter that contributed to why that encounter was challenging or perhaps did not go to plan.

Describe those TWO clinical reasoning errors chosen and discuss how these may have occurred and why. How were the errors eventually remedied? how could they have been mitigated? How could it have impacted on patient outcomes if the error was not identified? In this section you may have to recall elements/assessment data from your clinical encounter to contextualise your discussion.

Conclusion (500 words)

Reflect on and process new learning’

From your exploration, consider your future nursing practice. What did you learn? what would you do differently next time? What strategies will you use? How has this enhanced your clinical reasoning skills? This forms a reasonable portion of your paper and therefore you need to demonstrate deep reflection here. Saying ‘I would read more about…..’, etc is not sufficient. We really need to see the encounter as a whole. What have you learnt from this that has better enabled you to ‘think like a registered nurse’.

In addition to the information provided in the unit outline, a rubric is provided to guide your preparation of this assessment task. Word counts for each section are to be considered as a guideline.

medication for dyslipidemia

 Case Study #5 NURS 6541: Trina is a 9-year-old female who weighs 110 pounds. Vital signs are as follows: BP 122/79, P 98, R 20. Her mother reports she is a picky eater and refuses to eat fruits and vegetables. Her physical activity includes soccer practice for 1 hour a week with one game each weekend from September through November. Family history is negative for myocardial infarction, but both parents take medication for dyslipidemia.

Post an explanation of the differential diagnosis for the patient in the case study you selected. Explain which is the most likely diagnosis for the patient and why. Include an explanation of unique characteristics of the disorder you identified as the primary diagnosis. Then, explain a treatment and management plan for the patient, including appropriate dosages for any recommended treatments. Finally, explain strategies for educating patients and families on the treatment and management of the respiratory, cardiovascular, and/or genetic disorder.

health care settings

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to identify nursing care models utilized in today’s various health care settings and enhance your knowledge of how models impact the management of care and may influence delegation. You will assess the effectiveness of models and determine how you would collaborate with a nurse leader to identify opportunities for improvement to ensure quality, safety and staff satisfaction.

Course Outcomes

Completion of this assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.

CO1: Apply leadership concepts, skills, and decision making in the provision of high quality nursing care, healthcare team management, and the oversight and accountability for care delivery in a variety of settings. (PO2)

CO2: Implement patient safety and quality improvement initiatives within the context of the interprofessional team through communication and relationship building. (PO3)

CO3: Participate in the development and implementation of imaginative and creative strategies to enable systems to change. (PO7)

CO4: Apply concepts of leadership and team coordination to promote the achievement of safe and quality outcomes of care for diverse populations. (PO4)

CO6: Develop a personal awareness of complex organizational systems and integrate values and beliefs with organizational mission. (PO7)

CO7: Apply leadership concepts in the development and initiation of effective plans for the microsystems and/or system-wide practice improvements that will improve the quality of healthcare delivery. (PO2, and 3)

CO8: Apply concepts of quality and safety using structure, process, and outcome measures to identify clinical questions as the beginning process of changing current practice. (PO8)

  1. Read your text, Finkelman (2016), pp- 111-116.
  2. You are required to complete the assignment using the template.
  3. Observe staff in delivery of nursing care provided. Practice settings may vary depending on availability.
  4. Identify the model of nursing care that you observed. Be specific about what you observed, who was doing what, when, how and what led you to identify the particular model
  5. Review and summarize one scholarly resource (not your textbook) related to the nursing care model you observed in the practice setting.
  6. Review and summarize one scholarly resource (not including your text) related to a nursing care model that is different from the one you observed in the practice setting.
  7. Discuss the nursing care model from step #6, and how it could be implemented to improve quality of nursing care, safety and staff satisfaction. Be specific.
  8. Summarize this experience/assignment and what you learned about the two nursing care models.
  9. Submit your completed worksheet no later than 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday by the end of Week 5.

References and important information:

Week5  leader Examplar Audio Transcript

After working a number of years in home health, I made the decision to return to the acute care setting and accepted a full time night position on a very busy and high acuity step down unit. Upon learning of the unit that I would be working on, many of my nurse friends and former colleagues began warning me about the current supervisor on that unit and filling me with self-doubt regarding my ability to perform up to this person’s expectations.

On my first day, I was introduced to my supervisor and preceptor who was none other than Sue, the very person that I had been warned about. Hoping for the best but fearing the worst, I decided to put all of the bad things that I had heard out of my mind and see what happened.

In doing so, I quickly discovered that Sue would become the best supervisor and preceptor that I had ever had. She immediately took a vested interest in my success by sitting down with me each week for coffee and discussing what was going well and not going so well. Together, we worked to establish both short-term and long-term goals for not only my time with her in orientation but my future ones as a member of the staff on the unit. Sue helped me to identify weaknesses within myself by allowing me to reflect on situations rather than immediately pointing them out to me. Likewise, she made it a point to highlight my strengths and provided me with opportunities to put them into use in the practice setting. She provided support and encouragement when needed while at the same time allowing me to grow in my independence and autonomy.

I truly believe that I am the nurse, educator, and leader that I am today because of the leadership, support, and guidance that Sue provided me all those years ago.

Amy Sherer MSN, RN
Assistant Professor, RNBSN Option
Chamberlain College of Nursing

[End of Transcript]

Quality and Safety Initiatives

How do we promote quality? Some of these activities include: problem solving to improve communication, integration of the NAS quality and safety standards into everyday practice, and dedication to the National Patient Safety Goals in healthcare as implemented by The Joint Commission (2017). Provider curricula were reviewed, and the performance of root cause analysis of errors and near misses became part of strategies. The result has been an improved work environment and increased nursing leadership in these areas.

Nursing is a key collaborative discipline in addressing patient quality and safety concerns. According to the study by Squires, Tourangeau, Spence-Laschinger, and Doran (2010), nurse leaders and managers create a positive safety climate through quality relationships based on fairness and empathy. It seems that the transformational leader, a leadership style introduced earlier in this course, would be driving quality and safety outcomes.

Inspiring Performance Improvement

PI (performance improvement), CQI (continuous quality improvement), TQM (total quality management), QA (quality assurance), QC (quality control), and QI (quality improvement) are all acronyms for programs and initiatives that have been used over the years to monitor the delivery of quality care. Are we dizzy yet with all these acronyms? For the purposes of this lesson, we will concentrate on QI, or quality improvement. And, who should inspire others in these initiatives?

Inspiring quality improvement is a goal for all nurse leaders. It is geared toward unlocking individual potential and assisting staff to provide high quality, safe care at all times while continuously looking for ways to improve that care, as well as the environment where patients receive that care. QI is about inspiring change, a topic discussed in a previous lesson. Fostering an environment where change is encouraged and improvements are expected must be linked to the mission, vision, and values of the healthcare organization regardless of size, care delivery model, or geographic setting.

Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN)

In addition to the core competencies designated by the NAS, nursing education has placed an increasing emphasis on quality and safety through the Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) initiative funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (2015). These should sound familiar to you. QSEN provides resources and strategies to facilitate learning as it relates to the five competencies of NAS plus safety.

  • Patient-centered care
  • Teamwork and collaboration
  • Evidence-based practice
  • Quality improvement
  • Safety
  • Informatics

This initiative has provided nursing programs, as well as staff development and continuing education professionals with many tools to teach these six competencies. Visit http://www.qsen.org (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. to review the prelicensure KSAs (knowledge, skills, and attributes or abilities) and graduate KSAs. While browsing the site, investigate the teaching strategies section to glean ideas about how to integrate QSEN competencies into your nursing education and staff education endeavors.

The Nurse Leader Ponders

“We have utilized several of these initiatives here. Most staff are involved but how do I need to get more of them involved? I wonder if QSEN was discussed in their nursing education programs. Perhaps this is the frame of reference I should use to get more buy in from the staff.”

Monitoring Organizational Performance

Just as a dashboard in a car tells you at a glance about its performance, so can a dashboard of the organization help you monitor its performance measures. Remember the Windshield Survey from Community Health. A dashboard (electronic) holds all the quality indicator outcomes in one picture.

Anyone working in an acute care environment has probably heard of nurse-sensitive quality indicators. These have been profiled over the past few years as payment restrictions were instituted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in October of 2009. Subsequently, insurance companies have followed suit. According to the Managed Care First Report (2011), the no-pay policy is an effort to reduce medical errors. This brought attention to nursing because many of the no-pay situations could be managed or controlled through nursing care. Since then, staffing levels and staff mix have become a major factor in measuring performance.

Lean Daily Management

Somewhat new to the quality scene is Lean Daily Management (LDM). What is it? It is a much disciplined process that gives staff the power to solve problems by providing them with the leadership support and various resources to make improvements in care. On a daily basis, staff make their concerns about workflow problems known to the executive (top) leadership in the organization. A hallmark of the management process is the Safety Huddle. Many units/departments begin their day with a safety huddle which allows for identification and allocation of resources. Some of these resources can be staffing, acknowledging patient safety issues and concerns from various stakeholders. Prioritization of problems seems to be a hallmark of the safety huddle. Interestingly enough, this is led by the Chief Executive Officer. One cannot argue with a system that involves executive team involvement on a daily basis with the outcomes being directly related to patient safety and quality of care.

Leader’s Role in Just Culture

One cannot complete a lesson on Performance Improvement/Quality/Safety Initiatives without learning more about the term Just Culture. In early 2010 the American Nurses Association Board of Directors adopted its new position statement proposed by the Congress on Nursing Practice and Economics related to Just Culture (ANA, 2010). This updated position statement emphasized the support by the ANA of the Just Culture concept and how it is used in health care to improve safety. The ANA continues to support collaboration of the various boards of nursing, professional nursing organizations, hospital associations and others in developing Just Culture initiatives. The just culture model (from the aviation industry) provides for an environment where one is encouraged to report mistakes instead of ignoring or hiding them. In this environment practitioners should not be accountable for failures related to systems over which they have no control. It operationalizes a non-blame principle where process improvement is the outcome. Prevention of future errors is a result.

The Nurse Leader’s role in promoting a Just Culture work environment cannot be overestimated. Staff need to know that patient safety is everyone’s responsibility, avoiding blame and supporting a culture of safety for patients, their families and the staff who provide the highest quality care for them.

“This has been a busy week but since my job is all about improving quality in home care, I found the topics very interesting. I still have much to learn and I may share some of this with my Nurse Leader. I know I have one more Assignment to complete but that is not until the end of next week. I have not done a PowerPoint assignment….ever…so I need to use the website that was recommended by my instructor and get started on this.”

Summary

This week, we broached the subject of quality improvement, an issue that faces nurses in all practice settings. This core competency is important to all nurses, especially nurse leaders. QSEN was introduced as an initiative providing resources for nurse educators. And, Lean Daily Management and Just Culture were introduced. Becoming more familiar with these topics is important. The emphasis on safety in today’s healthcare environment cannot be ignored. Our patients are counting on us.

References

American Nurses Association. (2010). Position statement: Just culture. ANA. Retrieved from http://nursingworld.org/psjustculture

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). (2011). CMS is the latest to deny payment for hospital-acquired conditions. Managed Care First Report Daily News. Retrieved from http://www.mccfirstreport.com/show_story.php?newsid=6697

Finkelman, A. (2016). Leadership and management for nurses: Core Competencies for quality care (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

National Safety Academy. (1999). To err is human: Building a safer health system. Retrieved from http://nationalacademies.org/hmd/reports/1999/to-err-is-human-building-a-safer-health-system.aspx

Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN). (2015). Competencies. QSEN. Retrieved from http://qsen.org/competencies/

Squires, M., Tourangeau, A., Spence Laschinger, H. K., & Doran, D. (2010). The link between leadership and safety outcomes in hospitals. Journal of Nursing Management, 18(8), 914–925.

The Joint Commission. (2017). National Patient Safety Goals. TJC. Retrieved from http://www.jointcommission.org/standards_information/npsgs.aspx

planning and development stages

While the implementation plan prepares students to apply their research to the problem or issue they have identified for their capstone change proposal project, the literature review enables students to map out and move into the active planning and development stages of the project.

A literature review analyzes how current research supports the PICOT, as well as identifies what is known and what is not known in the evidence. Students will use the information from the earlier PICOT Statement Paper and Literature Evaluation Table assignments to develop a 750-1,000 word review that includes the following sections:

  1. Title page
  2. Introduction section
  3. A comparison of research questions
  4. A comparison of sample populations
  5. A comparison of the limitations of the study
  6. A conclusion section, incorporating recommendations for further research

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.